Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reliability of 3D Depth Motion Sensors for Capturing Upper Body Motions and Assessing the Quality of Wheelchair Transfers.
Koontz, Alicia Marie; Neti, Ahlad; Chung, Cheng-Shiu; Ayiluri, Nithin; Slavens, Brooke A; Davis, Celia Genevieve; Wei, Lin.
Afiliación
  • Koontz AM; Human Engineering Research Laboratories, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA 15206, USA.
  • Neti A; Department of Bioengineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
  • Chung CS; Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
  • Ayiluri N; Human Engineering Research Laboratories, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA 15206, USA.
  • Slavens BA; Department of Bioengineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
  • Davis CG; Human Engineering Research Laboratories, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA 15206, USA.
  • Wei L; Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Sensors (Basel) ; 22(13)2022 Jun 30.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35808471
Wheelchair users must use proper technique when performing sitting-pivot-transfers (SPTs) to prevent upper extremity pain and discomfort. Current methods to analyze the quality of SPTs include the TransKinect, a combination of machine learning (ML) models, and the Transfer Assessment Instrument (TAI), to automatically score the quality of a transfer using Microsoft Kinect V2. With the discontinuation of the V2, there is a necessity to determine the compatibility of other commercial sensors. The Intel RealSense D435 and the Microsoft Kinect Azure were compared against the V2 for inter- and intra-sensor reliability. A secondary analysis with the Azure was also performed to analyze its performance with the existing ML models used to predict transfer quality. The intra- and inter-sensor reliability was higher for the Azure and V2 (n = 7; ICC = 0.63 to 0.92) than the RealSense and V2 (n = 30; ICC = 0.13 to 0.7) for four key features. Additionally, the V2 and the Azure both showed high agreement with each other on the ML outcomes but not against a ground truth. Therefore, the ML models may need to be retrained ideally with the Azure, as it was found to be a more reliable and robust sensor for tracking wheelchair transfers in comparison to the V2.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Silla de Ruedas Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Sensors (Basel) Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Silla de Ruedas Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Sensors (Basel) Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Suiza