Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Client attitudes toward virtual treatment court.
Ray, Bradley; Kunkel, Tara; Bryant, Kristina; Hedden, Bethany; Andraka-Christou, Barbara; O'Neil, Meghan; Huynh, Philip.
Afiliación
  • Ray B; RTI International, Division for Applied Justice Research, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, United States of America. Electronic address: bradleyray@rti.org.
  • Kunkel T; Rulo Strategies, 1405 South Fern Street, Box 213, Arlington, VA 22202, United States of America.
  • Bryant K; National Center for State Courts, 300 Newport Avenue, Williamsburg, VA 23185, United States of America.
  • Hedden B; Wayne State University, Department of Anthropology, 656 W. Kirby St. #3054, Detroit, MI 48202, United States of America; Wayne State University, School of Social Work, 5447 Woodward Ave., Detroit, MI 48202, United States of America; Wayne State University, School of Social Work, Center for Behaviora
  • Andraka-Christou B; College of Community Innovation & Education, School of GlobalHealth Management and Informatics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States of America.
  • O'Neil M; University of Michigan, Population Studies Center, Institute for Social Research, 735 S. State Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States of America.
  • Huynh P; Wayne State University, School of Social Work, Center for Behavioral Health & Justice, 5447 Woodward Ave., Detroit, MI 48202, United States of America.
J Subst Abuse Treat ; 140: 108833, 2022 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35779292
INTRODUCTION: As a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many treatment courts shifted to offering teleservices. We sought to examine the barriers that clients faced when transitioning to virtual court and treatment, and how this transition impacted their perceptions of the treatment court experience. METHODS: The National Center for State Courts administered an online survey between January 1, 2021, and July 31, 2021, deployed to state and local court administrators, which resulted in 1356 unique client responses from 121 courts. The survey measured attitudes about the treatment court process, including interactions with the judge, the behavioral health treatment staff, and treatment groups, as well as barriers to virtual and in-person court. We hypothesized that clients with fewer technological barriers to virtual service, who shifted to virtual court or treatment, would report more positive attitudes to this service delivery. RESULTS: Clients felt more comfortable participating in virtual court sessions than in-person sessions but were less likely to feel like the judge was familiar with their case during virtual court sessions. From the treatment perspective, clients felt more connected with other group members and reported greater benefit from treatment staff when treatment services were delivered in-person, but clients felt less anxious when treatment groups were virtual. CONCLUSIONS: Even though virtual experiences were more comfortable than in-person experiences for clients, the results are nuanced and show preference for some in-person connections as they transitioned to virtual connections. Future research should examine how to improve client connections with staff/group members during virtual court or treatment sessions, particularly as courts and treatment providers are likely to continue some services virtually into the future.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pandemias / COVID-19 Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Subst Abuse Treat Asunto de la revista: TRANSTORNOS RELACIONADOS COM SUBSTANCIAS Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pandemias / COVID-19 Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Subst Abuse Treat Asunto de la revista: TRANSTORNOS RELACIONADOS COM SUBSTANCIAS Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos