Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Action effect predictions in 'what', 'when', and 'whether' intentional actions.
Chung, Wai Ying; Darriba, Álvaro; Korka, Betina; Widmann, Andreas; Schröger, Erich; Waszak, Florian.
Afiliación
  • Chung WY; Université Paris Cité, CNRS, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, F-75006 Paris, France. Electronic address: waiying.chung.0@gmail.com.
  • Darriba Á; Université Paris Cité, CNRS, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, F-75006 Paris, France. Electronic address: alvaro.darriba@parisdescartes.fr.
  • Korka B; University of Leipzig, Germany. Electronic address: betina-christiana.korka@uni-leipzig.de.
  • Widmann A; University of Leipzig, Germany; Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany. Electronic address: widmann@uni-leipzig.de.
  • Schröger E; University of Leipzig, Germany. Electronic address: schroger@uni-leipzig.de.
  • Waszak F; Université Paris Cité, CNRS, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, F-75006 Paris, France. Electronic address: f.waszak@gmx.net.
Brain Res ; 1791: 147992, 2022 09 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35753390
It has been proposed that intentional action can be separated into three major types depending on the nature of the action choice - what (selecting what to do), when (selecting when to act) and whether (to perform the action or not). While many theories on action control assume that intentional action involves the prediction of action effects, there has not been any attempt to compare the three types of intentional actions (what, when, whether) with respect to action-effect prediction. Here, we employ an action-effect prediction paradigm where participants select the action on every trial based on either the what (choosing between alternative actions), when (choosing to respond at different time points) or whether (choosing to perform an action or not) action components, and each action choice is followed by either a predicted (standard) or a mispredicted (deviant) tone. We found a significant P2 difference between standard/deviant tones reflecting the formation of action-effect predictions regardless of whether the action choice was based on the 'what', 'when' or 'whether' decision. Furthermore, our analysis revealed that this P2 difference for the prediction effect was not observable in non-action trials within the 'whether' condition, which suggests an action-specific prediction process.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Brain Res Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Brain Res Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Países Bajos