Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How are patient-related characteristics associated with shared decision-making about treatment? A scoping review of quantitative studies.
Keij, Sascha M; de Boer, Joyce E; Stiggelbout, Anne M; Bruine de Bruin, Wändi; Peters, Ellen; Moaddine, Saïda; Kunneman, Marleen; Pieterse, Arwen H.
Afiliación
  • Keij SM; Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • de Boer JE; Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Stiggelbout AM; Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Bruine de Bruin W; Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, Dornsife Department of Psychology, and Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Peters E; Center for Science Communication Research, School of Journalism and Communication, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.
  • Moaddine S; Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Kunneman M; Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Pieterse AH; Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
BMJ Open ; 12(5): e057293, 2022 05 24.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35613791
OBJECTIVES: To identify what patient-related characteristics have been reported to be associated with the occurrence of shared decision-making (SDM) about treatment. DESIGN: Scoping review. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Peer-reviewed articles in English or Dutch reporting on associations between patient-related characteristics and the occurrence of SDM for actual treatment decisions. INFORMATION SOURCES: COCHRANE Library, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, PubMed and Web of Science were systematically searched for articles published until 25 March 2019. RESULTS: The search yielded 5289 hits of which 53 were retained. Multiple categories of patient characteristics were identified: (1) sociodemographic characteristics (eg, gender), (2) general health and clinical characteristics (eg, symptom severity), (3) psychological characteristics and coping with illness (eg, self-efficacy) and (4) SDM style or preference. Many characteristics showed no association or unclear relationships with SDM occurrence. For example, for female gender positive, negative and, most frequently, non-significant associations were seen. CONCLUSIONS: A large variety of patient-related characteristics have been studied, but for many the association with SDM occurrence remains unclear. The results will caution often-made assumptions about associations and provide an important step to target effective interventions to foster SDM with all patients.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Participación del Paciente / Toma de Decisiones Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Ethics / Patient_preference Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Participación del Paciente / Toma de Decisiones Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Ethics / Patient_preference Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido