Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Systematic Review on Evaluating Responsiveness of Parent- or Caregiver-Reported Child Maltreatment Measures for Interventions.
Yoon, Sangwon; Speyer, Renée; Cordier, Reinie; Aunio, Pirjo; Hakkarainen, Airi.
Afiliación
  • Yoon S; Department of Special Needs Education, Faculty of Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Speyer R; Department of Special Needs Education, Faculty of Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Cordier R; Curtin School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
  • Aunio P; Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.
  • Hakkarainen A; Curtin School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Trauma Violence Abuse ; 24(4): 2297-2318, 2023 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35603524
Aims: Child maltreatment (CM) is a global public health and social problem, resulting in serious long-term health and socioeconomic consequences. As parents are the most common perpetrators of CM, parenting interventions are appropriate strategies to prevent CM. However, research on parenting interventions on CM has been hampered by lack of consensus on what measures are most responsive to detect a reduction in parental maltreating behaviours after parenting intervention. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the responsiveness of all current parent- or caregiver-reported CM measures. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in CINAHL, Embase, ERIC, PsycINFO, PubMed and Sociological Abstracts. The quality of studies and responsiveness of the measures were evaluated using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Only measures developed and published in English were included. Studies reporting data on responsiveness of the included measures were selected. Results: Sixty-nine articles reported on responsiveness of 15 identified measures. The study quality was overall adequate. The responsiveness of the measures was overall insufficient or not reported; high-quality evidence on responsiveness was limited. Conclusions: Only the Physical Abuse subscale of the ISPCAN Child Abuse Screening Tool for use in Trials (ICAST-Trial) can be recommended as most responsive for use in parenting interventions, with high-quality evidence supporting sufficient responsiveness. All other overall scales or subscales of the 15 included measures were identified as promising based on current data on responsiveness. Additional psychometric evidence is required before they can be recommended.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Maltrato a los Niños / Cuidadores Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Trauma Violence Abuse Asunto de la revista: TRAUMATOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Noruega Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Maltrato a los Niños / Cuidadores Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Trauma Violence Abuse Asunto de la revista: TRAUMATOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Noruega Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos