Experiments make a good breakfast, but a poor supper.
Behav Brain Sci
; 45: e79, 2022 05 13.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-35550225
Cesario's analysis has three key flaws. First, the focus on whether an effect is "real" (an "effects flaw") overlooks the importance of theory testing. Second, obsession with effects (a "fetishization flaw") sidelines theoretically informed questions about when and why an effect may arise. Third, failure to take stock of cultural and historical context (a "decontextualization flaw") strips findings of meaning.
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Behav Brain Sci
Año:
2022
Tipo del documento:
Article
Pais de publicación:
Reino Unido