Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Exploring paediatricians' experiences with performance improvement modules and quality improvement.
Hendricks, Justin J; Theis, Ryan; Mann, Keith J; Turner, Adam L; Filipp, Stephanie L; Leslie, Laurel K; Rosenthal, Cameron; Byrne, Alexandra; Black, Erik; Thompson, Lindsay A.
Afiliación
  • Hendricks JJ; Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • Theis R; Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • Mann KJ; American Board of Pediatrics, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Turner AL; American Board of Pediatrics, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Filipp SL; Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • Leslie LK; American Board of Pediatrics, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Rosenthal C; Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • Byrne A; Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • Black E; Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • Thompson LA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA lathom@ufl.edu.
BMJ Open Qual ; 11(2)2022 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35534041
OBJECTIVE: The American Board of Pediatrics' (ABP) maintenance of certification (MOC) programme seeks to continue educating paediatricians throughout their careers by encouraging lifelong learning and continued improvement. The programme includes four parts, each centring on a different aspect of medical practice. Part 4 MOC centres on quality improvement (QI). Surveys by the ABP suggest that paediatricians are dissatisfied with aspects of part 4, but their reasons are unclear. This study sought to explore factors contributing to dissatisfaction with part 4 by focusing on performance improvement modules (PIMs), a popular means of achieving part 4 credit. METHODS: The study used cross-sectional purposive sampling drawing from US physicians working in a range of practice settings: private outpatient, hospital, academic and low-income clinics. The sampling frame was divided by practice characteristics and satisfaction level, derived from a five-point Likert item asking about physician satisfaction regarding a recent PIM. In-depth interviews were conducted with 21 physicians, and the interview data were coded, categorised into themes and analysed using a framework analysis approach. RESULTS: Paediatricians expressed nuanced views of PIMs and remain globally dissatisfied with part 4, although reasons for dissatisfaction varied. Concerns with PIMs included: (1) excessive time and effort; (2) limited improvement and (3) lack of clinically relevant topics. While most agreed that QI is important, participants felt persistently dissatisfied with the mechanics of doing PIMs, especially when QI tasks fell outside of their typical work regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Paediatricians agreed that part 4, PIMs, and QI efforts in general still lack clinical relevance and need to be more easily incorporated into practice workflow. Clinicians specifically felt that PIMs must be directly integrated with physicians' practice settings in terms of topic, data quality and metrics, and must address practice differences in time and monetary resources for completing large or complex projects.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médicos / Mejoramiento de la Calidad Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Child / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Qual Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médicos / Mejoramiento de la Calidad Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Child / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Qual Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido