Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Subjective and Objective Outcomes of Ankle Joint Arthrodesis with Either Ilizarov or Internal Fixation.
Morasiewicz, Piotr; Dejnek, Maciej; Orzechowski, Wiktor; Szelerski, Lukasz.
Afiliación
  • Morasiewicz P; Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Opole, University Hospital in Opole, Institute of Medical Sciences, Opole, Poland; Wroclaw Medical University, Department and Clinic of Orthopedic and Traumatologic Surgery, Wroclaw, Poland. Electronic address: morasp@poczta.onet.pl.
  • Dejnek M; Wroclaw Medical University, Department and Clinic of Orthopedic and Traumatologic Surgery, Wroclaw, Poland; Wroclaw Medical University, Department of Trauma and Hand Surgery, Wroclaw, Poland.
  • Orzechowski W; Wroclaw Medical University, Department and Clinic of Orthopedic and Traumatologic Surgery, Wroclaw, Poland.
  • Szelerski L; Medical University of Warsaw, Department of Orthopedics and Musculoskeletal Traumatology, Warsaw, Poland.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 62(1): 39-44, 2023.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35450767
After arthroplasty, arthrodesis of the ankle joint is the most common method to treat advanced ankle osteoarthritis. The goal of the study was to assess the subjective and objective outcomes in 2 different types of fixation for ankle joint arthrodesis. We retrospectively assessed 47 patients who had undergone ankle joint arthrodesis with fixation either via an Ilizarov apparatus (group 1) (n = 21) or cannulated screws (group 2) (n = 26). The outcomes were measured by: (1) the quantity of analgesics administered, (2) the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, (3) general patient satisfaction, (4) the patients' decision to undergo the same procedure given another chance, and (5) the necessity of blood transfusion during hospitalization. Data was collected at the last postoperative follow-up visit. The AOFAS scores in group 1 and group 2 patients were 73.9 ± 13 and 72.7 ± 14.3, respectively. In group 1, 17 patients (81%) were very satisfied with the results, while in group 2, 19 patients (73%) were very satisfied with the results (p = .043). Two group 1 patients (10%) and four group 2 patients (15.3%) reported that they were satisfied with the outcomes (p = .035). Two patients (10%) from group 1 and three patients (11%) from group 2 were fairly satisfied. Seventeen patients (81%) after arthrodesis with Ilizarov fixation and 21 patients (81%) after arthrodesis with internal fixation would choose the same procedure given the opportunity to choose again. In group 1 there were no patients who required blood transfusion; in group 2 one patient (4%) required blood transfusion; the difference was statistically significant (p = .039). Nineteen group 1 patients (90%) were administered an analgesic preoperatively, while postoperatively only 6 (29%) required analgesics. In group 2, 24 patients (92%) were administered analgesics preoperatively, with 8 (31%) of them still requiring analgesics postoperatively. Ankle arthrodesis patients from both group 1 and group 2 achieved good subjective and objective results of treatment. We noted slightly better results in the Ilizarov apparatus group.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Osteoartritis / Técnica de Ilizarov Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Foot Ankle Surg Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Osteoartritis / Técnica de Ilizarov Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Foot Ankle Surg Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos