Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Nudging physical distancing behaviors during the pandemic: a field experiment on passengers in the subway stations of shiraz, Iran.
Shiraly, Ramin; Khoshdel, Nika; Jeihooni, Ali Khani; McLaws, Mary-Louise.
Afiliación
  • Shiraly R; Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Health Behavior Science Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. rshiraly@gmail.com.
  • Khoshdel N; Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Jeihooni AK; Nutrition Research Center, Department of Public Health, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  • McLaws ML; School of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
BMC Public Health ; 22(1): 702, 2022 04 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35399067
BACKGROUND: The possibility of the emergence of new pandemics necessitates further research into using simple strategies to promote social distancing behaviors in public. Most of the current evidence on effectiveness of physical distancing interventions is based on self-report and measure of intention which will not necessarily predict actual behavior. METHODS: A field experimental study was conducted in the subway stations of Shiraz, Southern Iran. The interventions were based on intuitions from protection motivation theory and consisted of using environmental nudges to notify the passengers of the pandemic situation (threat appeal) and a verbal advice on keeping a safe physical distance as an effective method of protection against COVID-19 (coping message). Average physical distancing was estimated as the number of steps between two consecutive passengers and was compared between interventions (n = 1045) and the control (n = 855) groups. RESULTS: A total of 1900 people riding on subway escalators were directly observed during two intervention conditions and the control condition. Under either threat or coping-based interventions, passengers were two times more likely (OR 2.0, 95%CI 1.5-2.7, P <  0.001) to keep a physical distance of at least 1.2 m from the traveler in front compared with those who did receive no intervention. The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed that there was a significant improvement in physical distancing behaviors with coping advice compared with threat appeal and the control conditions (χ2 = 120.84, df = 2, p <  0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that simple and inexpensive theory-based interventions can be used in crowded public spaces to promote physical distancing within the context of the pandemic.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Vías Férreas / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: BMC Public Health Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Irán Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Vías Férreas / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: BMC Public Health Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Irán Pais de publicación: Reino Unido