Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of a batched-extraction method for measurement of sirolimus, tacrolimus, and cyclosporine on the Architect i2000SR.
Di Meo, Ashley; Youkhana, Sandra; Khalifeh, Seham; Brinc, Davor.
Afiliación
  • Di Meo A; Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Youkhana S; Division of Clinical Biochemistry, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Khalifeh S; Division of Clinical Biochemistry, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Brinc D; Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Clinical Biochemistry, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: davor.brinc@uhn.ca.
Clin Chim Acta ; 531: 230-236, 2022 Jun 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35390337
BACKGROUND: Manual extraction of immunosuppressants is required before measurement on the Architect immunoassay analyzer. The individual extraction of samples places clinical laboratory staff at risk for ergonomic injury. We evaluated the analytical performance of a batched extraction method for measuring sirolimus, tacrolimus, and cyclosporine using the Architect i2000SR. METHODS: Residual whole blood samples from patients receiving immunosuppressant therapy were used for evaluation. The analytical evaluation included imprecision, linearity, and method comparison. Technologist-to-technologist variation was also assessed. RESULTS: Total imprecision ranged from 2.58 to 3.13% for sirolimus, 2.70-3.77% for tacrolimus, and 7.82-12.41% for cyclosporine. Linearity was verified from 0.44-19.49 µg/l for sirolimus, 0.05-26.15 µg/l for tacrolimus, and 0.15-991.55 µg/l for cyclosporine. Deming regression analysis showed slope and intercept were not significant for either technologist-to-technologist comparison or for batched vs. individual processing comparison. Bland-Altman analysis of individual vs. batched processing revealed a mean bias of 1.29% (LLOA: -14.63%, ULOA: 17.21%) for sirolimus, 2.07% (LLOA: -10.87%, ULOA: 15%) for tacrolimus, and -1.56% (LLOA: -20.05%, ULOA: 16.94%) for cyclosporine. The values were not significantly different from the bias and LLOAs observed for technologist-to-technologist comparison. CONCLUSIONS: The imprecision and linearity of batched methods met analytical goals. The batched method also correlated well with the individual extraction methods. The ULOA and LLOA for all drugs tested exceeded a TAE or ± 15%. However, similar range of differences was observed between technologists, suggesting that batch processing did not increase or reduce variability due to manual preparation steps.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tacrolimus / Ciclosporina Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Chim Acta Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá Pais de publicación: Países Bajos
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tacrolimus / Ciclosporina Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Chim Acta Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá Pais de publicación: Países Bajos