Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical and radiographic outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients 60 years of age and younger.
Neel, Garrett B; Boettcher, Marissa L; Eichinger, Josef K; Friedman, Richard J.
Afiliación
  • Neel GB; Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
  • Boettcher ML; Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
  • Eichinger JK; Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
  • Friedman RJ; Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. Electronic address: friedman@musc.edu.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 31(9): 1803-1809, 2022 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35346847
BACKGROUND: Although initially indicated for use in older patients, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is being increasingly used in younger patients. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients aged <60 years to those aged 60-79 years following primary rTSA. METHODS: 154 patients aged <60 years and 1763 patients aged 60-79 years were identified from an international multi-institutional Western Institutional Review Board-approved registry with a minimum 2 years' follow-up. All patients were evaluated and scored preoperatively and at latest follow-up using 5 outcome scoring metrics and 4 active range of motion (ROM) measurements. RESULTS: Patients aged <60 years were more often male (P = .023), had a higher body mass index (P = .001), higher rates of previous surgery (57% vs. 27%, P < .001), higher rates of post-traumatic arthritis (11% vs. 5%, P < .001) and inflammatory arthropathy (13% vs. 4%, P < .001), and lower rates of rotator cuff tear arthropathy (25% vs. 38%, P = .006). There were no differences in ROM between the groups but patients aged <60 years had significantly lower function and outcome metric scores and higher pain scores at latest follow-up. Adverse event rates were similar between the 2 groups, but patients aged <60 years were more likely to require revision (5.2% vs. 1.8%, P = .004). Patients aged <60 years also had lower satisfaction scores (much better/better 86% vs. 92%, P = .006). CONCLUSION: At a mean follow-up of 47 months, primary rTSA patients aged <60 years had worse clinical outcomes compared with those aged 60-79 years, with lower outcome scores, increased pain, lower function scores, and less patient satisfaction. Patients aged <60 years had higher rates of previous surgery, inflammatory arthropathy, and post-traumatic arthritis, whereas those aged 60-79 years had higher rates of rotator cuff tear arthropathy. Although complications were similar, younger patients had 3 times the risk of revision rTSA.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Artritis / Articulación del Hombro / Artropatía por Desgarro del Manguito de los Rotadores / Lesiones del Manguito de los Rotadores / Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Artritis / Articulación del Hombro / Artropatía por Desgarro del Manguito de los Rotadores / Lesiones del Manguito de los Rotadores / Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos