Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk factors for wound dehiscence following radical cystectomy: a prediction model.
Nasrallah, Ali A; Mansour, Mazen; Abou Heidar, Nassib F; Ayoub, Christian; Najdi, Jad A; Tamim, Hani; El Hajj, Albert.
Afiliación
  • Nasrallah AA; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Mansour M; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Abou Heidar NF; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Ayoub C; Faculty of Medicine, University of Balamand, Koura, Lebanon.
  • Najdi JA; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Tamim H; Clinical Research Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • El Hajj A; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, P.O. Box 11-0236, Riad El-Solh, 1107 2020 Beirut, Lebanon.
Ther Adv Urol ; 13: 17562872211060570, 2021.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35173813
OBJECTIVES: Radical cystectomy (RC) is a complex urologic procedure performed for the treatment of bladder cancer and causes significant morbidity. Wound dehiscence (WD) is a major complication associated with RC and is associated with multiple risk factors. The objectives of this study are to identify clinical risk factors for incidence of WD and develop a risk-prediction model to aid in patient risk-stratification and improvement of perioperative care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was used to derive the study cohort. A univariate analysis provided nine variables eligible for multivariate model entry. A stepwise logistic regression analysis was conducted and refined considering clinical relevance of the variables, and then bootstrapped with 1000 samples, resulting in a five-factor model. Model performance and calibration were assessed by a receiver operated curve (ROC) analysis and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test for goodness of fit, respectively. RESULTS: A cohort of 11,703 patients was identified from years 2005 to 2017, with 342 (2.8%) incidences of WD within 30 days of operation. The final five-factor model included male gender [odds ratio (OR) = 2.5, p < 0.001], surgical site infection (OR = 6.3, p < 0.001), smoking (OR = 1.8, p < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (OR = 1.9, p < 0.001), and weight class; morbidly obese patients had triple the odds of WD (OR = 2.9, p < 0.001). The ROC analysis provided a C-statistic of 0.76 and calibration R 2 was 0.99. CONCLUSION: The study yields a statistically robust and clinically beneficial five-factor model for estimation of WD incidence risk following RC, with good performance and excellent calibration. These factors may assist in identifying high-risk patients, providing preoperative counseling and thus leading to improvement in perioperative care.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Ther Adv Urol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Líbano Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Ther Adv Urol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Líbano Pais de publicación: Reino Unido