Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Partial Extraction Therapy: A Review of Human Clinical Studies.
Wu, David T; Raoof, Shahram; Latimer, Jessica M; Nguyen, Thomas T.
Afiliación
  • Wu DT; Division of Periodontology, Department of Oral Medicine, Infection, and Immunity, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Raoof S; Division of Periodontology, Department of Oral Medicine, Infection, and Immunity, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Latimer JM; Division of Periodontology, Department of Oral Medicine, Infection, and Immunity, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Nguyen TT; Division of Periodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Oral Implantol ; 48(5): 436-454, 2022 Oct 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34937086
Partial extraction therapy (PET) is a collective concept encompassing a group of surgical techniques including socket shield, root membrane, proximal shield, pontic shield, and root submergence. PET uses the patient's own root structure to maintain blood supply derived from the periodontal ligament complex to preserve the periodontium and peri-implant tissues during restorative and implant therapy. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge regarding PET techniques and present a comprehensive evaluation of human clinical studies in the literature. Two independent reviewers conducted electronic and manual searches until January 1, 2021, in the following electronic bibliographic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, and Dentistry & Oral Sciences Source. Gray literature was searched to identify additional candidates for potential inclusion. Articles were screened by a group of 4 reviewers using the Covidence software and synthesized. A systematic search of the literature yielded 5714 results. Sixty-four articles were selected for full-text assessment, of which 42 eligible studies were included in the review. Twelve studies were added to the synthesis after a manual search of the reference lists. A total of 54 studies were examined in this review. In sum, PET techniques offer several clinical advantages: (1) preservation of buccal bone postextraction and limitation of alveolar ridge resorption, (2) mitigation of the need for invasive ridge augmentation procedures, and (3) soft-tissue dimensional stability and high esthetic outcomes. Further randomized clinical studies with larger sample sizes are needed to improve the understanding of the long-term clinical outcomes of PET.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar / Aumento de la Cresta Alveolar / Carga Inmediata del Implante Dental Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Oral Implantol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar / Aumento de la Cresta Alveolar / Carga Inmediata del Implante Dental Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Oral Implantol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos