Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance of a Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography-Derived Risk-Stratification Tool for High-risk and Very High-risk Prostate Cancer.
Xiang, Michael; Ma, Ting Martin; Savjani, Ricky; Pollom, Erqi L; Karnes, R Jeffrey; Grogan, Tristan; Wong, Jessica K; Motterle, Giovanni; Tosoian, Jeffrey J; Trock, Bruce J; Klein, Eric A; Stish, Bradley J; Dess, Robert T; Spratt, Daniel E; Pilar, Avinash; Reddy, Chandana; Levin-Epstein, Rebecca; Wedde, Trude B; Lilleby, Wolfgang A; Fiano, Ryan; Merrick, Gregory S; Stock, Richard G; Demanes, D Jeffrey; Moran, Brian J; Huland, Hartwig; Tran, Phuoc T; Martin, Santiago; Martinez-Monge, Rafael; Krauss, Daniel J; Abu-Isa, Eyad I; Alam, Ridwan; Schwen, Zeyad; Pisansky, Thomas M; Choo, C Richard; Song, Daniel Y; Greco, Stephen; Deville, Curtiland; McNutt, Todd; DeWeese, Theodore L; Ross, Ashley E; Ciezki, Jay P; Boutros, Paul C; Nickols, Nicholas G; Bhat, Prashant; Shabsovich, David; Juarez, Jesus E; Chong, Natalie; Kupelian, Patrick A; Rettig, Matthew B; Zaorsky, Nicholas G.
Afiliación
  • Xiang M; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles.
  • Ma TM; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles.
  • Savjani R; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles.
  • Pollom EL; Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
  • Karnes RJ; Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Grogan T; Department of Medicine Statistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
  • Wong JK; Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Motterle G; Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Tosoian JJ; Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
  • Trock BJ; Department of Urology, Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Klein EA; Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Stish BJ; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Dess RT; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
  • Spratt DE; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
  • Pilar A; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Reddy C; Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Levin-Epstein R; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles.
  • Wedde TB; Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Lilleby WA; Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Fiano R; Schiffler Cancer Center, Wheeling Hospital, Wheeling Jesuit University, Wheeling, West Virginia.
  • Merrick GS; Schiffler Cancer Center, Wheeling Hospital, Wheeling Jesuit University, Wheeling, West Virginia.
  • Stock RG; Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York.
  • Demanes DJ; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles.
  • Moran BJ; Prostate Cancer Foundation of Chicago, Westmont, Illinois.
  • Huland H; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Tran PT; Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Martin S; Department of Oncology, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
  • Martinez-Monge R; Department of Oncology, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
  • Krauss DJ; Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, Michigan.
  • Abu-Isa EI; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
  • Alam R; Department of Urology, Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Schwen Z; Department of Urology, Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Pisansky TM; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Choo CR; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Song DY; Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Greco S; Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Deville C; Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • McNutt T; Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • DeWeese TL; Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Ross AE; Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Ciezki JP; Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Boutros PC; Department of Human Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles.
  • Nickols NG; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles.
  • Bhat P; Department of Radiation Oncology, Veterans Affairs (VA) Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California.
  • Shabsovich D; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles.
  • Juarez JE; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles.
  • Chong N; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles.
  • Kupelian PA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles.
  • Rettig MB; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles.
  • Zaorsky NG; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(12): e2138550, 2021 12 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34902034
Importance: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) can detect low-volume, nonlocalized (ie, regional or metastatic) prostate cancer that was occult on conventional imaging. However, the long-term clinical implications of PSMA PET/CT upstaging remain unclear. Objectives: To evaluate the prognostic significance of a nomogram that models an individual's risk of nonlocalized upstaging on PSMA PET/CT and to compare its performance with existing risk-stratification tools. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included patients diagnosed with high-risk or very high-risk prostate cancer (ie, prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level >20 ng/mL, Gleason score 8-10, and/or clinical stage T3-T4, without evidence of nodal or metastatic disease by conventional workup) from April 1995 to August 2018. This multinational study was conducted at 15 centers. Data were analyzed from December 2020 to March 2021. Exposures: Curative-intent radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), or EBRT plus brachytherapy (BT), with or without androgen deprivation therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: PSMA upstage probability was calculated from a nomogram using the biopsy Gleason score, percentage positive systematic biopsy cores, clinical T category, and PSA level. Biochemical recurrence (BCR), distant metastasis (DM), prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Fine-Gray and Cox regressions. Model performance was quantified with the concordance (C) index. Results: Of 5275 patients, the median (IQR) age was 66 (60-72) years; 2883 (55%) were treated with RP, 1669 (32%) with EBRT, and 723 (14%) with EBRT plus BT; median (IQR) PSA level was 10.5 (5.9-23.2) ng/mL; 3987 (76%) had Gleason grade 8 to 10 disease; and 750 (14%) had stage T3 to T4 disease. Median (IQR) follow-up was 5.1 (3.1-7.9) years; 1221 (23%) were followed up for at least 8 years. Overall, 1895 (36%) had BCR, 851 (16%) developed DM, and 242 (5%) died of prostate cancer. PSMA upstage probability was significantly prognostic of all clinical end points, with 8-year C indices of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.61-0.65) for BCR, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.66-0.71) for DM, 0.71 (95% CI, 0.67-0.75) for PCSM, and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.57-0.62) for PCSM (P < .001). The PSMA nomogram outperformed existing risk-stratification tools, except for similar performance to Staging Collaboration for Cancer of the Prostate (STAR-CAP) for PCSM (eg, DM: PSMA, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.66-0.71] vs STAR-CAP, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.62-0.68]; P < .001; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.54-0.60]; P < .001; Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment groups, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.51-0.56]; P < .001). Results were validated in secondary cohorts from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and the National Cancer Database. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that PSMA upstage probability is associated with long-term, clinically meaningful end points. Furthermore, PSMA upstaging had superior risk discrimination compared with existing tools. Formerly occult, PSMA PET/CT-detectable nonlocalized disease may be the main driver of outcomes in high-risk patients.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Biomarcadores de Tumor / Glutamato Carboxipeptidasa II / Nomogramas / Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones / Reglas de Decisión Clínica / Antígenos de Superficie Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: JAMA Netw Open Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Biomarcadores de Tumor / Glutamato Carboxipeptidasa II / Nomogramas / Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones / Reglas de Decisión Clínica / Antígenos de Superficie Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: JAMA Netw Open Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos