Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Radiation Dose and Image Quality of a High-Pitch Prospective Spiral First Approach in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA).
Finck, Tom; Klambauer, Konstantin; Hendrich, Eva; Will, Albrecht; Martinoff, Stefan; Hadamitzky, Martin.
Afiliación
  • Finck T; Institute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, German Heart Centre Munich, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636 Munich, Germany.
  • Klambauer K; Institute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, German Heart Centre Munich, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636 Munich, Germany.
  • Hendrich E; Institute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, German Heart Centre Munich, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636 Munich, Germany.
  • Will A; Institute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, German Heart Centre Munich, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636 Munich, Germany.
  • Martinoff S; Institute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, German Heart Centre Munich, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636 Munich, Germany.
  • Hadamitzky M; Institute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, German Heart Centre Munich, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636 Munich, Germany.
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis ; 8(10)2021 Sep 24.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34677188
Objective: To investigate a high-pitch spiral first (HPSF) approach for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in an unselected patient cohort and compare diagnostic yield and radiation exposure to CCTAs acquired via conventional, non-high-pitch spiral first (NHPSF) scan regimes. Materials and Methods: All consecutive patients from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2017 were included. Two investigation protocols (HPSF/NHPSF) were used with the aim to achieve diagnostic image quality of all coronary segments. Low-pitch secondary scans followed the initial examination if image quality was unsatisfactory. Dosage and image quality were compared between both regimes. Results: 1410 patients were subject to a HPSF and 236 patients to a NHPSF approach. While the HPSF approach led to a higher fraction of re-scans (35% vs. 11%, p < 0.001), the fraction of aggregate scans that remained non-diagnostic after considering the initial and secondary scan was comparably low for the HPSF and NHPSF approach (0.78 vs. 0%, p = 0.18). Aggregate radiation exposure in the HPSF protocol was significantly lower (1.12 mSv (IQR: 0.73, 2.10) vs. 3.96 mSv (IQR: 2.23, 8.33) p < 0.001). Conclusions: In spite of a higher number of re-scans, a HPSF approach leads to a reduction in overall radiation exposure with diagnostic yields similar to a NHPSF approach.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: J Cardiovasc Dev Dis Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania Pais de publicación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: J Cardiovasc Dev Dis Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania Pais de publicación: Suiza