Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Epinephrine (adrenaline) compared to selective beta-2-agonist in adults or children with acute asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Baggott, Christina; Hardy, Jo Katherine; Sparks, Jenny; Sabbagh, Doñah; Beasley, Richard; Weatherall, Mark; Fingleton, James.
Afiliación
  • Baggott C; Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Hardy JK; Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Sparks J; Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Sabbagh D; Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Beasley R; Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Weatherall M; Capital and Coast District Health Board, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Fingleton J; Medicine, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Thorax ; 77(6): 563-572, 2022 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34593615
BACKGROUND: International asthma guidelines recommend against epinephrine (adrenaline) administration in acute asthma unless associated with anaphylaxis or angio-oedema. However, administration of intramuscular epinephrine in addition to nebulised selective ß2-agonist is recommended for acute severe or life-threatening asthma in many prehospital guidelines. We conducted a systematic review to determine the efficacy of epinephrine in comparison to selective ß2-agonist in acute asthma. METHODS: We included peer-reviewed publications of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that enrolled children or adults in any healthcare setting and compared epinephrine by any route to selective ß2-agonist by any route for an acute asthma exacerbation. The primary outcome was treatment failure, including hospitalisation, need for intubation or death. RESULTS: Thirty-eight of 1140 studies were included. Overall quality of evidence was low. Seventeen studies contributed data on 1299 participants to the meta-analysis. There was significant statistical heterogeneity, I2=56%. The pooled Peto's OR for treatment failure with epinephrine versus selective ß2-agonist was 0.99 (0.75 to 1.32), p=0.95. There was strong evidence that recruitment age group was associated with different estimates of the odds of treatment failure; with studies recruiting adults-only having lower odds of treatment failure with epinephrine. It was not possible to determine whether epinephrine in addition to selective ß2-agonist improved outcomes. CONCLUSION: The low-quality evidence available suggests that epinephrine and selective ß2-agonists have similar efficacy in acute asthma. There is a need for high-quality double-blind RCTs to determine whether addition of intramuscular epinephrine to inhaled or nebulised selective ß2-agonist improves outcome. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017079472.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Asma / Antiasmáticos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Límite: Adult / Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Thorax Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Nueva Zelanda Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Asma / Antiasmáticos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Límite: Adult / Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Thorax Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Nueva Zelanda Pais de publicación: Reino Unido