Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of two-view versus single-view digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D-mammography in breast cancer surveillance imaging.
Hadjipanteli, Andria; Polyviou, Petros; Kyriakopoulos, Ilias; Genagritis, Marios; Kotziamani, Natasa; Moniatis, Demetris; Papoutsou, Anne; Constantinidou, Anastasia.
Afiliación
  • Hadjipanteli A; Medical School, Shacolas Educational Centre for Clinical Medicine, Palaios dromos Lefkosias Lemesou, University of Cyprus, Aglantzia, Nicosia, Cyprus.
  • Polyviou P; Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Strovolos, Nicosia, Cyprus.
  • Kyriakopoulos I; German Oncology Center, Agios Athanasios, Limassol, Cyprus.
  • Genagritis M; Medical School, Shacolas Educational Centre for Clinical Medicine, Palaios dromos Lefkosias Lemesou, University of Cyprus, Aglantzia, Nicosia, Cyprus.
  • Kotziamani N; Protypo Diagnostiko Kentro A. Kanakas & I. Kyriakopoulos, Nicosia, Cyprus.
  • Moniatis D; The Breast Center of Cyprus, Karyatides Business Centre, Strovolos, Nicosia, Cyprus.
  • Papoutsou A; Breast Imaging Center, Limassol, Cyprus.
  • Constantinidou A; Ygia Polyclinic Private Hospital, Limassol, Cyprus.
PLoS One ; 16(9): e0256514, 2021.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34587170
PURPOSE: Limited work has been performed for the implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in breast cancer surveillance imaging. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences between two different DBT implementations in breast cancer surveillance imaging, for patients with a personal history of breast cancer. METHOD: The DBT implementations investigated were: (1) 2-view 2D digital mammography and 2-view DBT (2vDM&2vDBT) (2) 1-view (cranial-caudal) DM and 1-view (mediolateral-oblique) DBT (1vDM&1vDBT). Clinical performance of these two implementations was assessed retrospectively using observer studies with 118 sets of real patient images, from a single imaging centre, and six observers. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) using the Jack-knife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristics (JAFROC) analysis were evaluated. RESULTS: Results suggest that the two DBT implementations are not significantly different in terms of sensitivity, specificity and AUC. When looking at the two main different lesion types, non-calcifications and calcifications, and two different density levels, no difference in the performance of the two DBT implementations was found. CONCLUSIONS: Since 1vDM&1vDBT exposes the patient to half the dose of 2vDM&2vDBT, it might be worth considering 1vDM&1vDBT in breast cancer surveillance imaging. However, larger studies are required to conclude on this matter.
Asunto(s)
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Mama / Neoplasias de la Mama / Mamografía / Imagenología Tridimensional Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Chipre Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Mama / Neoplasias de la Mama / Mamografía / Imagenología Tridimensional Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Chipre Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos