Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic accuracy of screening questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnoea in adults in different clinical cohorts: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bernhardt, Lizelle; Brady, Emer M; Freeman, Suzanne C; Polmann, Helena; Réus, Jéssica Conti; Flores-Mir, Carlos; De Luca Canto, Graziela; Robertson, Noelle; Squire, Iain B.
Afiliación
  • Bernhardt L; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester, LE3 9QP, UK. lb382@le.ac.uk.
  • Brady EM; Community Health Services, Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust, Leicester, UK. lb382@le.ac.uk.
  • Freeman SC; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester, LE3 9QP, UK.
  • Polmann H; Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
  • Réus JC; Brazilian Centre for Evidence-Based Research, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brazil.
  • Flores-Mir C; Brazilian Centre for Evidence-Based Research, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brazil.
  • De Luca Canto G; Department of Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
  • Robertson N; Brazilian Centre for Evidence-Based Research, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brazil.
  • Squire IB; Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Sleep Breath ; 26(3): 1053-1078, 2022 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34406554
PURPOSE: The majority of individuals with clinically significant obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) are undiagnosed and untreated. A simple screening tool may support risk stratification, identification, and appropriate management of at-risk patients. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated and compared the accuracy and clinical utility of existing screening questionnaires for identifying OSA in different clinical cohorts. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies assessing the diagnostic value of OSA screening questionnaires. We identified prospective studies, validated against polysomnography, and published to December 2020 from online databases. To pool the results, we used random effects bivariate binomial meta-analysis. RESULTS: We included 38 studies across three clinical cohorts in the meta-analysis. In the sleep clinic cohort, the Berlin questionnaire's pooled sensitivity for apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) ≥ 5, ≥ 15, and ≥ 30 was 85%, 84%, and 89%, and pooled specificity was 43%, 30%, and 33%, respectively. The STOP questionnaire's pooled sensitivity for AHI ≥ 5, ≥ 15, and ≥ 30 was 90%, 90%, and 95%, and pooled specificity was 31%, 29%, and 21%. The pooled sensitivity of the STOP-Bang questionnaire for AHI ≥ 5, ≥ 15, and ≥ 30 was 92%, 95%, and 96%, and pooled specificity was 35%, 27%, and 28%. In the surgical cohort (AHI ≥ 15), the Berlin and STOP-Bang questionnaires' pooled sensitivity were 76% and 90% and pooled specificity 47% and 27%. CONCLUSION: Among the identified questionnaires, the STOP-Bang questionnaire had the highest sensitivity to detect OSA but lacked specificity. Subgroup analysis considering other at-risk populations was not possible. Our observations are limited by the low certainty level in available data.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sleep Breath Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA / OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sleep Breath Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA / OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Alemania