Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Women's report of mistreatment during facility-based childbirth: validity and reliability of community survey measures.
Leslie, Hannah Hogan; Sharma, Jigyasa; Mehrtash, Hedieh; Berger, Blair Olivia; Irinyenikan, Theresa Azonima; Balde, Mamadou Dioulde; Mon, Nwe Oo; Maya, Ernest; Soumah, Anne-Marie; Adu-Bonsaffoh, Kwame; Maung, Thae Maung; Bohren, Meghan A; Tunçalp, Özge.
Afiliación
  • Leslie HH; Global Health and Population, Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA hannah.leslie@ucsf.edu.
  • Sharma J; Division of Prevention Science, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Mehrtash H; Chief Economist's Office, Human Development Group, World Bank Group, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
  • Berger BO; Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland.
  • Irinyenikan TA; Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Balde MD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Medical Sciences Teaching Hospital Complex, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria.
  • Mon NO; Cellulle de Recherche en Sante de la Reproduction en Guinee (CERREGUI), University National Hospital-Donka, Conakry, Guinea.
  • Maya E; Department of Medical Research, Ministry of Health and Sports, Yangon, Myanmar.
  • Soumah AM; School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
  • Adu-Bonsaffoh K; Cellulle de Recherche en Sante de la Reproduction en Guinee (CERREGUI), University National Hospital-Donka, Conakry, Guinea.
  • Maung TM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ghana Medical School, Accra, Ghana.
  • Bohren MA; Department of Medical Research, Ministry of Health and Sports, Yangon, Myanmar.
  • Tunçalp Ö; Gender and Women's Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, University of Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
BMJ Glob Health ; 5(Suppl 2)2021 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34362792
BACKGROUND: Accountability for mistreatment during facility-based childbirth requires valid tools to measure and compare birth experiences. We analyse the WHO 'How women are treated during facility-based childbirth' community survey to test whether items mapping the typology of mistreatment function as scales and to create brief item sets to capture mistreatment by domain. METHODS: The cross-sectional community survey was conducted at up to 8 weeks post partum among women giving birth at hospitals in Ghana, Guinea, Myanmar and Nigeria. The survey contained items assessing physical abuse, verbal abuse, stigma, failure to meet professional standards, poor rapport with healthcare workers, and health system conditions and constraints. For all domains except stigma, we applied item-response theory to assess item fit and correlation within domain. We tested shortened sets of survey items for sensitivity in detecting mistreatment by domain. Where items show concordance and scale reliability ≥0.60, we assessed convergent validity with dissatisfaction with care and agreement of scale scores between brief and full versions. RESULTS: 2672 women answered over 70 items on mistreatment during childbirth. Reliability exceeded 0.60 in all countries for items on poor rapport with healthcare workers and in three countries for items on failure to meet professional standards; brief scales generally showed high agreement with longer versions and correlation with dissatisfaction. Brief item sets were ≥85% sensitive in detecting mistreatment in each country, over 90% for domains of physical abuse and health system conditions and constraints. CONCLUSION: Brief scales to measure two domains of mistreatment are largely comparable with longer versions and can be informative for these four distinct settings. Brief item sets efficiently captured prevalence of mistreatment in the five domains analysed; stigma items can be used and adapted in full. Item sets are suitable for confirmation by context and implementation to increase accountability and inform efforts to eliminate mistreatment during childbirth.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de la Atención de Salud / Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Glob Health Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de la Atención de Salud / Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Glob Health Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido