Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Differences in self-perceived OHRQoL between fully dentate subjects and edentulous patients depending on their prosthesis type, socio-demographic profile, and clinical features.
García-Minguillán, Gonzalo; Preciado, Arelis; Romeo, Marta; Río, Jaime Del; Lynch, Christopher D; Castillo-Oyagüe, Raquel.
Afiliación
  • García-Minguillán G; Europa Sur Higher Training Center (Dentistry, Cesur), Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: gonzalogmg28@gmail.com.
  • Preciado A; Faculty of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: arepreci@ucm.es.
  • Romeo M; Faculty of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: mromeo@ucm.es.
  • Río JD; Faculty of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: jrh@ucm.es.
  • Lynch CD; University Dental School & Hospital/ University College Cork, Wilton, Cork, Ireland. Electronic address: chris.lynch@ucc.ie.
  • Castillo-Oyagüe R; Faculty of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: raquel.castillo@ucm.es.
J Dent ; 114: 103756, 2021 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34333055
OBJECTIVES: This observational cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate and compare the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and clinical performance between dentate subjects and edentulous patients restored with conventional dentures or implant overdentures. METHODS: 85 edentulous patients were grouped as follows: Group-1 (CD): conventional denture wearers (n = 42), and Group-2 (IO): implant-retained overdenture wearers (n = 43). For the OHRQoL comparisons, a control group of subjects with a healthy natural dentition (Group-3, ND; n = 50) was included. Participants completed three validated questionnaires (OHIP-14sp, OHIP-20sp, and QoLIP-10). Socio-demographic data, prosthesis-related factors, clinical condition of the mouth, and patient subjective evaluations, were gathered. Descriptive and non-parametric probes were run (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The ND group was the most unsatisfied (OHIP-14sp; p ≤ 0.001). The OHIP-20sp attributed significantly worse Psychological disability (p = 0.029) and Handicap (p = 0.027) to CD wearers when compared to IO wearers. The CD group showed the significantly highest need for relining (p = 0.041), and the lowest retention (p = 0.011). The OHIP-14sp disclosed a significantly worse OHRQoL for those volunteers who had a job (p = 0.003), a basic education instead of a secondary one (p = 0.022), and no partner (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The overall OHRQoL was comparable for both prosthodontic groups, being modulated by socio-demographic and prosthesis-related features. Nonetheless, CD wearers presented prosthetic complications more frequently. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: While dentate subjects were the most critical about their oral condition and its repercussion in their life, implant overdenture wearers tended to observe a better OHRQoL and clinical performance compared to conventional denture wearers.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Implantes Dentales Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Dent Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Implantes Dentales Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Dent Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido