Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical wear and quality assessment of monolithic and lithium disilicate layered zirconia restorations.
Çömlekoglu, M E; Tekeroglu, F; Dündar Çömlekoglu, M; Özcan, M; Türkün, L S; Paken, G.
Afiliación
  • Çömlekoglu ME; Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Tekeroglu F; Private Dental Practice, Kusadasi, Aydin, Turkey.
  • Dündar Çömlekoglu M; Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Özcan M; Division of Dental Biomaterials, Center of Dental Medicine, Clinic for Reconstructive Dentistry, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
  • Türkün LS; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Paken G; Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Usak University, Usak, Turkey.
Aust Dent J ; 66(4): 413-422, 2021 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34319585
BACKGROUND: Wear and quality assessments of translucent monolithic zirconia and CAD-on® restorations were performed. METHODS: Forty 3-unit posterior fixed partial denture (FPD) in 18 patients (age:18-50 years) were made from translucent monolithic zirconia (tm) (Zenostar T) and zirconia-frameworked, lithium disilicate layered (c) (CAD-on), materials in a split-mouth design. Restorations were digitally fabricated and their internal and marginal adaptations were measured before cementation followed by luting (Multilink Speed). Clinical evaluations were made by modified United States Public Health Service criteria at baseline, 6, 12, and 24-months. Wear of the restorations and the antagonists were digitally evaluated after optical scanning of stone casts at 1st week and 24 m through a software (Cerec 4.4). Statistical analysis was made (analysis of variance, Shapiro-Wilk, Friedman and Wilcoxon tests (SPSS 20)) at α = 0.05 significance level. RESULTS: At 24 m, all restorations were clinically acceptable. Insignificant differences were found between tm and c restorations (P > 0.05). Mean internal and marginal adaptation of c restorations were significantly better (145 µm (premolar)-174 µm (molar)) than tm (190 µm (premolar)-207 µm (molar)) (P < 0.05). C restorations significantly caused more wear (0.3 ± 0.1 mm) than tm (0.1 ± 0.07 mm) on the antagonistic dentition (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Translucent monolithic zirconia restorations caused less wear and antagonist wear than CAD-on restorations. CAD-on restorations exhibited higher internal and marginal adaptation.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Coronas / Porcelana Dental Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Aust Dent J Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía Pais de publicación: Australia
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Coronas / Porcelana Dental Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Aust Dent J Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía Pais de publicación: Australia