Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Elective versus nonelective brain tumor resections: a 5-year propensity score matching cost comparison analysis.
Chan, Alvin Y; Choi, Elliot H; Oh, Michael Y; Vadera, Sumeet; Chen, Jefferson W; Golshani, Kiarash; Wilson, William C; Hsu, Frank P K.
Afiliación
  • Chan AY; Departments of1Neurological Surgery and.
  • Choi EH; Departments of1Neurological Surgery and.
  • Oh MY; Departments of1Neurological Surgery and.
  • Vadera S; Departments of1Neurological Surgery and.
  • Chen JW; Departments of1Neurological Surgery and.
  • Golshani K; Departments of1Neurological Surgery and.
  • Wilson WC; 2Anesthesiology, University of California, Irvine, California.
  • Hsu FPK; Departments of1Neurological Surgery and.
J Neurosurg ; 136(1): 40-44, 2022 01 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34243148
OBJECTIVE: Elective surgical cases generally have lower costs, higher profit margins, and better outcomes than nonelective cases. Investigating the differences in cost and profit between elective and nonelective cases would help hospitals in planning strategies to withstand financial losses due to potential pandemics. The authors sought to evaluate the exact cost and profit margin differences between elective and nonelective supratentorial tumor resections at a single institution. METHODS: The authors collected economic analysis data in all patients who underwent supratentorial tumor resection at their institution between January 2014 and December 2018. The patients were grouped into elective and nonelective cases. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for heterogeneity of baseline characteristics between the two groups. RESULTS: There were 143 elective cases and 232 nonelective cases over the 5 years. Patients in the majority of elective cases had private insurance and in the majority of nonelective cases the patients had Medicare/Medicaid (p < 0.01). The total charges were significantly lower for elective cases ($168,800.12) compared to nonelective cases ($254,839.30, p < 0.01). The profit margins were almost 6 times higher for elective than for nonelective cases ($13,025.28 vs $2,128.01, p = 0.04). After propensity score matching, there was still a significant difference between total charges and total cost. CONCLUSIONS: Elective supratentorial tumor resections were associated with significantly lower costs with shorter lengths of stay while also being roughly 6 times more profitable than nonelective cases. These findings may help future planning for hospital strategies to survive financial losses during future pandemics that require widespread cancellation of elective cases.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos / Costos y Análisis de Costo / Puntaje de Propensión Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Neurosurg Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos / Costos y Análisis de Costo / Puntaje de Propensión Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Neurosurg Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos