Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Union of Radiocarpal Fusion With and Without Proximal Row Carpectomy: A Systematic Review.
Ruskin, Jeremy B; Shah, Harsh A; Congiusta, Dominick V; Ahmed, Irfan H; Vosbikian, Michael M.
Afiliación
  • Ruskin JB; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ. Electronic address: jbruskin1@gmail.com.
  • Shah HA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, FL.
  • Congiusta DV; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, FL.
  • Ahmed IH; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ.
  • Vosbikian MM; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ.
J Hand Surg Am ; 46(3): 200-208, 2021 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33663695
PURPOSE: Wrist fusion provides a solution to the painful, arthritic wrist, and can be concomitantly performed with or without a proximal row carpectomy (PRC). The benefits of combining a PRC with fusion include a large amount of local bone graft for fusion and a lower number of joints needed to fuse. We hypothesized that wrist fusion combined with PRC will have a higher fusion rate than wrist fusion performed without PRC. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify all papers involving wrist arthrodesis using the following databases: PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, Web of Science, and COCHRANE. A literature search was performed using the phrases "wrist" OR "radiocarpal" and "fusion" OR "arthrodesis". Inclusion criteria included complete radiocarpal fusion performed for rheumatoid, posttraumatic, or primary arthritis; union rates available; English-language study. Studies were excluded if case reports; diagnoses other than the ones listed previously; inability to abstract the data. Data collected included wrist fusions with PRC or without PRC, union rate, patient age, underlying diagnosis, and method of fixation. RESULTS: A total of 50 studies were included in the analysis. There were 41 studies with no PRC, 8 studies with PRC, and 1 study with and without PRC. There were 347 patients with a PRC and 339 patients had a successfully fused wrist (97.7%). There were 1,355 patients who had a wrist fusion with no PRC, and1,303 patients had successful wrist fusion (96.2%). The difference in fusion rate between the 2 groups, 97.7% versus 96.2%, was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: There is no statistically significant difference with regards to union rate in wrist fusion with a PRC versus wrist fusion without a PRC. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Huesos del Carpo Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Hand Surg Am Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Huesos del Carpo Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Hand Surg Am Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos