Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Acute Myocardial Infarction Cohorts Defined by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision Versus Diagnosis-Related Groups: Analysis of Diagnostic Agreement and Quality Measures in an Integrated Health System.
Levy, Andrew E; Hammes, Andrew; Anoff, Debra L; Raines, Joshua D; Beck, Natalie M; Rudofker, Eric W; Marshall, Kimberly J; Nensel, Jessica D; Messenger, John C; Masoudi, Frederick A; Pierce, Read G; Allen, Larry A; Ream, Karen S; Ho, P Michael.
Afiliación
  • Levy AE; Division of Cardiology (A.E.L., K.J.M., J.D.N., J.C.M., F.A.M., L.A.A., K.S.R.), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
  • Hammes A; Division of Cardiology, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, CO (A.E.L.).
  • Anoff DL; Division of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora (A.H.).
  • Raines JD; Division of Hospital Medicine (D.L.A.), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
  • Beck NM; Department of Medicine (J.D.R., N.M.B., E.W.R., P.M.H.), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
  • Rudofker EW; Department of Medicine (J.D.R., N.M.B., E.W.R., P.M.H.), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
  • Marshall KJ; Department of Medicine (J.D.R., N.M.B., E.W.R., P.M.H.), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
  • Nensel JD; Division of Cardiology (A.E.L., K.J.M., J.D.N., J.C.M., F.A.M., L.A.A., K.S.R.), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
  • Messenger JC; Division of Cardiology (A.E.L., K.J.M., J.D.N., J.C.M., F.A.M., L.A.A., K.S.R.), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
  • Masoudi FA; Division of Cardiology (A.E.L., K.J.M., J.D.N., J.C.M., F.A.M., L.A.A., K.S.R.), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
  • Pierce RG; Division of Cardiology (A.E.L., K.J.M., J.D.N., J.C.M., F.A.M., L.A.A., K.S.R.), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
  • Allen LA; Department of Medicine, Dell Medical School, Austin, TX (R.G.P.).
  • Ream KS; Division of Cardiology (A.E.L., K.J.M., J.D.N., J.C.M., F.A.M., L.A.A., K.S.R.), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
  • Ho PM; Division of Cardiology (A.E.L., K.J.M., J.D.N., J.C.M., F.A.M., L.A.A., K.S.R.), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 14(3): e006570, 2021 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33653116
BACKGROUND: Among Medicare value-based payment programs for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program uses International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes to identify the program denominator, while the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced program uses diagnosis-related groups (DRGs). The extent to which these programs target similar patients, whether they target the intended population (type 1 myocardial infarction), and whether outcomes are comparable between cohorts is not known. METHODS: In a retrospective study of 2176 patients hospitalized in an integrated health system, a cohort of patients assigned a principal ICD-10 diagnosis of AMI and a cohort of patients assigned an AMI DRG were compared according to patient-level agreement and outcomes such as mortality and readmission. RESULTS: One thousand nine hundred thirty-five patients were included in the ICD-10 cohort compared with 662 patients in the DRG cohort. Only 421 patients were included in both AMI cohorts (19.3% agreement). DRG cohort patients were older (70 versus 65 years, P<0.001), more often female (48% versus 30%, P<0.001), and had higher rates of heart failure (52% versus 33%, P<0.001) and kidney disease (42% versus 25%, P<0.001). Comparing outcomes, the DRG cohort had significantly higher unadjusted rates of 30-day mortality (6.6% versus 2.5%, P<0.001), 1-year mortality (21% versus 8%, P<0.001), and 90-day readmission (26% versus 19%, P=0.006) than the ICD-10 cohort. Two observations help explain these differences: 61% of ICD-10 cohort patients were assigned procedural DRGs for revascularization instead of an AMI DRG, and type 1 myocardial infarction patients made up a smaller proportion of the DRG cohort (34%) than the ICD-10 cohort (78%). CONCLUSIONS: The method used to identify denominators for value-based payment programs has important implications for the patient characteristics and outcomes of the populations. As national and local quality initiatives mature, an emphasis on ICD-10 codes to define AMI cohorts would better represent type 1 myocardial infarction patients.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud / Infarto del Miocardio Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud / Infarto del Miocardio Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos