Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Learning and innovation among interventional cardiologists: Insights from an international survey.
Vemmou, Evangelia; Nikolakopoulos, Ilias; Xenogiannis, Iosif; Karacsonyi, Judit; Rangan, Bavana V; Garcia, Santiago; Burke, Martin Nicholas; Jneid, Hani; Croce, Kevin J; Bergmark, Brian A; Brilakis, Emmanouil S.
Afiliación
  • Vemmou E; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Nikolakopoulos I; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Xenogiannis I; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Karacsonyi J; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Rangan BV; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Garcia S; Minneapolis Heart Institute at Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Burke MN; Minneapolis Heart Institute at Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Jneid H; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Croce KJ; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Bergmark BA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Brilakis ES; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 99(1): 11-16, 2022 01 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33565681
BACKGROUND: The willingness of interventional cardiologists to adopt innovation and implement changes in day-to-day practice has received limited study. METHODS: Online-based survey on learning and innovation: 38 questions were distributed via email list to interventional cardiologists. RESULTS: The survey was distributed to 8,110 e-mails and completed by 621 (7.7%, 91.8% men, 60% in the 35 to 54-year-old age group). Of the respondents who perform coronary interventions, 45% perform >100 cases of noncomplex percutaneous coronary interventions per year and of the respondents who perform structural interventions, 15% perform more than >100 transcatheter aortic valve replacements per year. Most respondents (86.7%) rate themselves as highly likely/likely to introduce recently approved equipment in everyday practice and 47.5% have tried a new coronary guidewire in the past 6 months. The most common reasons for reluctance to use new equipment were high cost (64%) and uncertainty about whether it provides additional benefits compared with existing equipment (48.5%). Radial access in STEMI cases is always used by 43.6% of the respondents and 55% always use radial access for coronary angiography. Of those who use femoral access, 32% always use ultrasound guidance and 91% have used a closure device in the last 6 months. Most respondents (80%) read journals to keep up with current practice and believe that the most effective way to learn is through attendance of workshops/short courses (77.5%). Most respondents (69%) are involved in research. CONCLUSION: Interventional cardiologists who participated in the survey are highly likely to adopt innovation in daily clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Intervención Coronaria Percutánea / Cardiólogos Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Asunto de la revista: CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Intervención Coronaria Percutánea / Cardiólogos Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Asunto de la revista: CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos