Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Registry-Based Study of Prevalence of Cleft Lip/Palate in Thailand from 2012 to 2015.
Fuangtharnthip, Pornpoj; Chonnapasatid, Wannapong; Thiradilok, Sasipa; Manopatanakul, Somchai; Jaruratanasirikul, Somchit.
Afiliación
  • Fuangtharnthip P; Department of Advanced General Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Chonnapasatid W; Master of Science in Advanced General Dentistry, Department of Advanced General Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Thailand.
  • Thiradilok S; Department of Advanced General Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Manopatanakul S; Department of Advanced General Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Jaruratanasirikul S; Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J ; 58(11): 1430-1437, 2021 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33486980
OBJECTIVE: Two main objectives were established. First objective was to determine the prevalence of the cleft lip and/or cleft palate (CL/P) in Thailand from 2012 to 2015 using the orofacial clefts (OFCs) registry and civil registration. Second objective was to conduct a quality control of this OFC registry especially for the Birth Defects Registration (BDR). DESIGN: Registry-based survey. SETTING: Analyzing data from the Thailand National Health Security Office. PARTICIPANTS: Registered patients with CL/P in Thailand from 2012 to 2015. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Duplicated records were verified using National Identity Number (Thai ID#) and date of birth. The prevalence of CL/P and specific phenotypes was then calculated. From this prevalence estimate method, quality assurance of the OFCs registry was possible. RESULTS: For the main outcome, the population-weighted pool prevalence of CL/P was 2.14 per 1000 live births (95% confidence interval of 2.08-2.20). Thai ID# and expense reimbursement systems were the main factors driving this cases capturing. However, this OFCs registration still requires active case finding with clinical verification, improvement of staff training and databases networking. CONCLUSIONS: This study reported a very high CL/P prevalence of Thailand. Strengths and limitations of these OFCs registry and BDR were described.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Labio Leporino / Fisura del Paladar Tipo de estudio: Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Cleft Palate Craniofac J Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Tailandia Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Labio Leporino / Fisura del Paladar Tipo de estudio: Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Cleft Palate Craniofac J Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Tailandia Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos