Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effect of a scalable online training module for shared decision making based on flawed video examples - a randomized controlled trial.
Geiger, Friedemann; Hacke, Claudia; Potthoff, Judith; Scheibler, Fueloep; Rueffer, Jens Ulrich; Kuch, Christine; Wehkamp, Kai.
Afiliación
  • Geiger F; Department of Pediatrics, The SHARE TO CARE project, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; Department of Psychology, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany. Elec
  • Hacke C; Department of Pediatrics, The SHARE TO CARE project, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
  • Potthoff J; Department of Pediatrics, The SHARE TO CARE project, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
  • Scheibler F; Department of Pediatrics, The SHARE TO CARE project, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
  • Rueffer JU; TAKEPART Media + Science, Cologne, Germany.
  • Kuch C; Department of Pediatrics, The SHARE TO CARE project, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
  • Wehkamp K; Department of Pediatrics, The SHARE TO CARE project, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; Department of Medical Management, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Patient Educ Couns ; 104(7): 1568-1574, 2021 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33334633
OBJECTIVE: Shared Decision Making (SDM) is considered the gold standard of medical decision making as it provides a method to systematically integrate the patient's preferences, evidence-based medicine and the experience of health care professionals. Therefore, evidence-based training methods for a broad implementation into healthcare are needed. A new online training was designed, based on the concept of flawed/flawless video examples and additional educational concepts. METHODS: In a single-blind randomized-controlled trial, medical students were randomly assigned to intervention group receiving the online training (n = 82) or waiting control group (n = 105). SDM-related knowledge and the ability to judge distinct levels of SDM were compared between both groups. Additionally, feedback regarding the intervention was collected. RESULTS: SDM-related knowledge and judging ability increased significantly in the intervention group compared to controls (SDM knowledge: mean difference: 12 %; 95 % CI: 7.3-18.5; p < 0.001; SDM judging ability (inter-rater concordance displayed by weighted t): mean difference: 0.07; 95 %CI: 0.03-0.11; p = 0.001). Feedback was positive. CONCLUSION: The online training with its distinctive methodology prove effective. As it shares the theoretical and didactical background with an already existing face-to-face training, both approaches may also be used complementarily. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: SDM can be trained effectively and efficiently with this easily scalable online training.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Participación del Paciente / Toma de Decisiones Conjunta Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Patient Educ Couns Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Irlanda
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Participación del Paciente / Toma de Decisiones Conjunta Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Patient Educ Couns Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Irlanda