Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Novel Quantitative Analysis Using Optical Imaging (VELscope) and Spectroscopy (Raman) Techniques for Oral Cancer Detection.
Jeng, Ming-Jer; Sharma, Mukta; Sharma, Lokesh; Huang, Shiang-Fu; Chang, Liann-Be; Wu, Shih-Lin; Chow, Lee.
Afiliación
  • Jeng MJ; Department of Electronic Engineering, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.
  • Sharma M; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou 244, Taiwan.
  • Sharma L; Department of Electronic Engineering, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.
  • Huang SF; Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.
  • Chang LB; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou 244, Taiwan.
  • Wu SL; Department of Public Health, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.
  • Chow L; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.
Cancers (Basel) ; 12(11)2020 Nov 13.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33202869
In this study, we developed a novel quantitative analysis method to enhance the detection capability for oral cancer screening. We combined two different optical techniques, a light-based detection technique (visually enhanced lesion scope) and a vibrational spectroscopic technique (Raman spectroscopy). Materials and methods: Thirty-five oral cancer patients who went through surgery were enrolled. Thirty-five cancer lesions and thirty-five control samples with normal oral mucosa (adjacent to the cancer lesion) were analyzed. Thirty-five autofluorescence images and 70 Raman spectra were taken from 35 cancer and 35 control group cryopreserved samples. The normalized intensity and heterogeneity of the 70 regions of interest (ROIs) were calculated along with 70 averaged Raman spectra. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) were used with principal component analysis (PCA) to differentiate the cancer and control groups (normal). The classifications rates were validated using two different validation methods, leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) and k-fold cross-validation. Results: The cryopreserved normal and tumor tissues were differentiated using the PCA-LDA and PCA-QDA models. The PCA-LDA of Raman spectroscopy (RS) had 82.9% accuracy, 80% sensitivity, and 85.7% specificity, while ROIs on the autofluorescence images were differentiated with 90% accuracy, 100% sensitivity, and 80% specificity. The combination of two optical techniques differentiated cancer and normal group with 97.14% accuracy, 100% sensitivity, and 94.3% specificity. Conclusion: In this study, we combined the data of two different optical techniques. Furthermore, PCA-LDA and PCA-QDA quantitative analysis models were used to differentiate tumor and normal groups, creating a complementary pathway for efficient tumor diagnosis. The error rates of RS and VELcope analysis were 17.10% and 10%, respectively, which was reduced to 3% when the two optical techniques were combined.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Taiwán Pais de publicación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Taiwán Pais de publicación: Suiza