Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Practising what we preach: clinical ethicists' professional perspectives and personal use of advance directives.
Wasserman, Jason Adam; Navin, Mark Christopher; Drzyzga, Victoria; Gibb, Tyler S.
Afiliación
  • Wasserman JA; Foundational Medical Studies and Pediatrics, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USA wasserman@oakland.edu.
  • Navin MC; Department of Philosophy, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, USA.
  • Drzyzga V; Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan, USA.
  • Gibb TS; Program in Medical Ethics, Humanities and the Law, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker MD School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA.
J Med Ethics ; 48(2): 144-149, 2022 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33106382
The field of clinical bioethics strongly advocates for the use of advance directives to promote patient autonomy, particularly at the end of life. This paper reports a study of clinical bioethicists' perceptions of the professional consensus about advance directives, as well as their personal advance care planning practices. We find that clinical bioethicists are often sceptical about the value of advance directives, and their personal choices about advance directives often deviate from what clinical ethicists acknowledge to be their profession's recommendations. Moreover, our respondents identified a pluralistic set of justifications for completing treatment directives and designating surrogates, even while the consensus view focuses on patient autonomy. Our results suggest important revisions to academic discussion and public-facing advocacy about advance care planning.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Bioética / Planificación Anticipada de Atención Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Ethics Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Med Ethics Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Bioética / Planificación Anticipada de Atención Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Ethics Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Med Ethics Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido