Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Spanish Pacemaker Registry. 17th Official Report of the Section on Cardiac Pacing of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (2019).
Pombo Jiménez, Marta; Cano Pérez, Óscar; Chimeno García, Javier; Bertomeu-González, Vicente.
Afiliación
  • Pombo Jiménez M; Unidad de Estimulación, Agencia Pública Empresarial Sanitaria Costa del Sol, Marbella, Málaga, Spain. Electronic address: mpomboj@gmail.com.
  • Cano Pérez Ó; Unidad de Electrofisiología y Arritmias, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
  • Chimeno García J; Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Virgen de la Concha, Zamora, Spain.
  • Bertomeu-González V; Sección de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario San Juan de Alicante, San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain; Departamento de Medicina Clínica, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Elche, Alicante, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Spain.
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) ; 73(12): 1038-1048, 2020 Dec.
Article en En, Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33060067
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: This report describes Spanish cardiac pacing activity during 2019: quantities and types of devices and demographic and clinical factors. METHODS: The analysis is based on data obtained from the European Pacemaker Patient Identification Card, data submitted to the online platform cardiodispositivos.es, and supplier-reported data on the total number of implanted pacemakers. RESULTS: Information was received on 15 833 procedures from 102 implantation centers, representing 39% of the estimated total activity. The implantation rates of conventional and resynchronization pacemakers were 832 and 32 units per million population, respectively. A total of 431 leadless pacemakers were implanted. Most implantations were performed in elderly patients (mean age, 78.7 years). Most electrodes were bipolar and with active fixation and 34.1% were magnetic resonance imaging-compatible. Atrioventricular block was the most common electrocardiographic abnormality. Dual-chamber sequential pacing predominated; nonetheless, up to 20% of patients in sinus rhythm received a single-chamber ventricular pacemaker, mainly those older than 80 years of age and women. Remote monitoring capability was present in 41% of cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers and in 14.8% of conventional pacemakers. CONCLUSIONS: Consumption of pacing generators increased by 1.6%, mainly due to a 15.1% increase in cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers. Sequential pacing predominates; its use is influenced by age and sex. Remote monitoring increased by 20.6% in cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers and continues to be scarce in conventional pacemakers.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Marcapaso Artificial / Cardiología Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans Idioma: En / Es Revista: Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: España

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Marcapaso Artificial / Cardiología Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans Idioma: En / Es Revista: Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: España