Distinguishing cerebrospinal fluid from mepivacaine using the pH test in patients undergoing elective cesarean section with combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.
JA Clin Rep
; 6(1): 75, 2020 Oct 02.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-33009603
INTRODUCTION: In single-space combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA), it is important to correctly determine if the fluid coming out of the spinal needle is cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or the liquid used in the loss of resistance (LOR) technique. In this study, we used mepivacaine for LOR and measured the pH values of CSF and mepivacaine to determine whether the pH test is a reliable method to confirm CSF when performing single-space CSEA. METHODS: This clinical trial included 47 full-term pregnant women who underwent cesarean section. Single-space CSEA was administered at the lumbar intervertebral space using a small amount of mepivacaine for LOR. The pH values of CSF and mepivacaine were determined by the color of the test strip immediately after dropping. The area under the curve (AUC) for the pH values was calculated to determine the cutoff value for distinguishing between CSF and mepivacaine. RESULTS: The median pH values were 7.7 (7.1-8.0) and 6.2 (5.9-6.8) for CSF and mepivacaine, respectively. When the cutoff value of pH for distinguishing CSF from mepivacaine was 7.1 or greater, the AUC was 1.0 (100% sensitivity and specificity). Our result demonstrated that CSF can be correctly distinguished from mepivacaine in patients undergoing cesarean section under single-space CSEA using a cutoff value of pH 7.1. CONCLUSION: The pH test is a simple and reliable method to confirm CSF when performing single-space CSEA with mepivacaine for LOR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Accuracy of pH test paper for cerebrospinal fluid during spinal anesthesia: prospective study in healthy pregnant women under scheduled caesarean section; University Hospital Medical Information Network, UMIN000036454 . Registered 1 May 2019.
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Tipo de estudio:
Observational_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
Idioma:
En
Revista:
JA Clin Rep
Año:
2020
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
Japón
Pais de publicación:
Alemania