Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comparative prospective study of short-term outcomes of extended view totally extraperitoneal (e-TEP) repair versus laparoscopic intraperitoneal on lay mesh (IPOM) plus repair for ventral hernia.
Kumar, Neeraj; Palanisamy, Nalankilli V; Parthasarathi, Ramakrishnan; Sabnis, Sandeep C; Nayak, Sunil Kumar; Palanivelu, Chinnusamy.
Afiliación
  • Kumar N; GEM Hospital and Research Centre, Coimbatore, India. neeraj891677@yahoo.com.
  • Palanisamy NV; GEM Hospital and Research Centre, Coimbatore, India.
  • Parthasarathi R; GEM Hospital and Research Centre, Coimbatore, India.
  • Sabnis SC; GEM Hospital and Research Centre, Coimbatore, India.
  • Nayak SK; GEM Hospital and Research Centre, Coimbatore, India.
  • Palanivelu C; GEM Hospital and Research Centre, Coimbatore, India.
Surg Endosc ; 35(9): 5072-5077, 2021 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32968915
BACKGROUND: Currently, minimally invasive approach is preferred for the treatment of ventral hernias. After the introduction of extended view totally extraperitoneal (e-TEP) technique, there has been a constant debate over the choice of better approach. In this study, we compare the short-term outcomes of e-TEP and laparoscopic IPOM Plus repair for ventral hernias. METHODS: This is a comparative, prospective single-center study done at GEM Hospital and research center Coimbatore, India from July 2018 to July 2019. All patients who underwent elective ventral hernia surgery with defect size of 2 to 6 cm were included. Patient demographics, hernia characteristics, operative and perioperative findings, and postoperative complications were systematically recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: We evaluated 92 cases (n = 92), 46 in each group. Mean age, sex, BMI, location of hernia, primary and incisional hernia, and comorbidity were comparable in both the groups. Mean defect size for IPOM Plus and e-TEP was 4 cm and 3.89 cm, respectively. Operative time was significantly higher for e-TEP, while postoperative pain (VAS), analgesic requirement, and postoperative hospital stay were significantly less as compared to IPOM Plus. However, 2 cases (4.35%) of e-TEP had recurrence but none in IPOM Plus group. CONCLUSION: e-TEP is an evolving procedure and comparable to IPOM Plus in terms of postoperative pain, analgesic requirement, cost of mesh, and length of hospital stay. More randomized controlled and multicentric studies are required with longer follow-up to validate our findings.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Laparoscopía / Hernia Inguinal / Hernia Ventral Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India Pais de publicación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Laparoscopía / Hernia Inguinal / Hernia Ventral Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India Pais de publicación: Alemania