Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Backward Walking and Dual-Task Assessment Improve Identification of Gait Impairments and Fall Risk in Individuals with MS.
Edwards, Erin M; Kegelmeyer, Deborah A; Kloos, Anne D; Nitta, Manon; Raza, Danya; Nichols-Larsen, Deborah S; Fritz, Nora E.
Afiliación
  • Edwards EM; Translational Neuroscience Program, Wayne State University, Detroit MI, USA.
  • Kegelmeyer DA; Program in Physical Therapy, Wayne State University, Detroit MI, USA.
  • Kloos AD; Division of Physical Therapy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Nitta M; School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Raza D; Division of Physical Therapy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Nichols-Larsen DS; School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Fritz NE; Program in Physical Therapy, Wayne State University, Detroit MI, USA.
Mult Scler Int ; 2020: 6707414, 2020.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32963832
BACKGROUND: Individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience deficits in motor and cognitive domains, resulting in impairment in dual-task walking ability. The goal of this study was to compare performance of forward walking and backward walking in single- and dual-task conditions in persons with MS to age- and sex-matched healthy controls. We also examined relationships between forward and backward walking to cognitive function, balance, and retrospective fall reports. METHODS: All measures were collected in a single session. A 2 × 2 × 2 mixed model ANOVA was used to compare differences in forward and backward walking in single- and dual-task conditions between MS and healthy controls. Spearman correlations were used to examine relationships between gait and cognitive function, falls, and balance. RESULTS: Eighteen individuals with relapsing-remitting MS and 14 age- and sex-matched healthy controls participated. Backward walking velocity revealed significant differences between groups for both single-task (p = 0.015) and dual-task (p = 0.014) conditions. Persons with MS demonstrated significant differences between single- and dual-task forward and backward walking velocities (p = 0.023; p = 0.004), whereas this difference was only apparent in the backward walking condition for healthy controls (p = 0.004). In persons with MS, there were significant differences in double support time between single- and dual-task conditions in both backward (p < 0.001) and forward (p = 0.001) directions. More falls at six months were significantly associated with shorter backward dual-task stride length (r = -0.490; p = 0.046) and slower velocity (r = -0.483; p = 0.050). CONCLUSION: Differences in MS and age- and sex-matched healthy controls are more pronounced during backward compared to forward walking under single- and dual-task conditions. Future work with a larger sample size is needed to validate the clinical utility of backward walking and dual-task assessments and mitigate the limited sensitivity of the current dual-task assessments that primarily rely upon forward walking.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Mult Scler Int Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Egipto

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Mult Scler Int Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Egipto