Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Implementation of a complex intervention to improve care for patients whose situations are clinically uncertain in hospital settings: A multi-method study using normalisation process theory.
Johnson, Halle; Yorganci, Emel; Evans, Catherine J; Barclay, Stephen; Murtagh, Fliss E M; Yi, Deokhee; Gao, Wei; Sampson, Elizabeth L; Droney, Joanne; Farquhar, Morag; Koffman, Jonathan.
Afiliación
  • Johnson H; Cicely Saunders Institute, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Yorganci E; Cicely Saunders Institute, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Evans CJ; Cicely Saunders Institute, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Barclay S; Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton General Hospital, Brighton, United Kingdom.
  • Murtagh FEM; Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom.
  • Yi D; Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.
  • Gao W; Cicely Saunders Institute, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Sampson EL; Cicely Saunders Institute, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Droney J; Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Farquhar M; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Koffman J; School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
PLoS One ; 15(9): e0239181, 2020.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32936837
PURPOSE: To examine the use of Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) to establish if, and in what ways, the AMBER care bundle can be successfully normalised into acute hospital practice, and to identify necessary modifications to optimise its implementation. METHOD: Multi-method process evaluation embedded within a mixed-method feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial in two district general hospitals in England. Data were collected using (i) focus groups with health professionals (HPs), (ii) semi-structured interviews with patients and/or carers, (iii) non-participant observations of multi-disciplinary team meetings and (iv) patient clinical note review. Thematic analysis and descriptive statistics, with interpretation guided by NPT components (coherence; cognitive participation; collective action; reflexive monitoring). Data triangulated across sources. RESULTS: Two focus groups (26 HPs), nine non-participant observations, 12 interviews (two patients, 10 relatives), 29 clinical note reviews were conducted. While coherence was evident, with HPs recognising the value of the AMBER care bundle, cognitive participation and collective action presented challenges. Specifically: (1) HPs were unable and unwilling to operationalise the concept of 'risk of dying' intervention eligibility criteria (2) integration relied on a 'champion' to drive participation and ensure sustainability; and (3) differing skills and confidence led to variable engagement with difficult conversations with patients and families about, for example, nearness to end of life. Opportunities for reflexive monitoring were not routinely embedded within the intervention. Reflections on the use of the AMBER care bundle from HPs and patients and families, including recommended modifications became evident through this NPT-driven analysis. CONCLUSION: To be successfully normalised, new clinical practices, such as the AMBER care bundle, must be studied within the wider context in which they operate. NPT can be used to the aid identification of practical strategies to assist in normalisation of complex interventions where the focus of care is on clinical uncertainty in acute hospital settings.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cuidados Críticos / Paquetes de Atención al Paciente Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cuidados Críticos / Paquetes de Atención al Paciente Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos