Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-Effectiveness of Operating on Traumatic Spinal Injuries in Low-Middle Income Countries: A Preliminary Report From a Major East African Referral Center.
Lessing, Noah L; Zuckerman, Scott L; Lazaro, Albert; Leech, Ashley A; Leidinger, Andreas; Rutabasibwa, Nicephorus; Shabani, Hamisi K; Mangat, Halinder S; Härtl, Roger.
Afiliación
  • Lessing NL; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Zuckerman SL; 12328Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Lazaro A; 12295Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Leech AA; 296671Muhimbili Orthopaedic Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
  • Leidinger A; 12327Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Rutabasibwa N; 58339Hospital General de Catalunya, Sant Cugat, Spain.
  • Shabani HK; 296671Muhimbili Orthopaedic Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
  • Mangat HS; 296671Muhimbili Orthopaedic Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
  • Härtl R; 12295Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Global Spine J ; 12(1): 15-23, 2022 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32799677
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis. OBJECTIVES: While the incidence of traumatic spine injury (TSI) is high in low-middle income countries (LMICs), surgery is rarely possible due to cost-prohibitive implants. The objective of this study was to conduct a preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis of operative treatment of TSI patients in a LMIC setting. METHODS: At a tertiary hospital in Tanzania from September 2016 to May 2019, a retrospective analysis was conducted to estimate the cost-effectiveness of operative versus nonoperative treatment of TSI. Operative treatment included decompression/stabilization. Nonoperative treatment meant 3 months of bed rest. Direct costs included imaging, operating fees, surgical implants, and length of stay. Four patient scenarios were chosen to represent the heterogeneity of spine trauma: Quadriplegic, paraplegic, neurologic improvement, and neurologically intact. Disability-adjusted-life-years (DALYs) and incremental-cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated to determine the cost per unit benefit of operative versus nonoperative treatment. Cost/DALY averted was the primary outcome (i.e., the amount of money required to avoid losing 1 year of healthy life). RESULTS: A total of 270 TSI patients were included (125 operative; 145 nonoperative). Operative treatment averaged $731/patient. Nonoperative care averaged $212/patient. Comparing operative versus nonoperative treatment, the incremental cost/DALY averted for each patient outcome was: quadriplegic ($112-$158/DALY averted), paraplegic ($47-$67/DALY averted), neurologic improvement ($50-$71/DALY averted), neurologically intact ($41-$58/DALY averted). Sensitivity analysis confirmed these findings without major differences. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that the upfront costs of spine trauma surgery may be offset by a reduction in disability. LMIC governments should consider conducting more spine trauma cost-effectiveness analyses and including spine trauma surgery in universal health care.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Global Spine J Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Global Spine J Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido