The use of chromatography hyphenated with mass spectrometry is a well-established approach in clinical and forensic toxicology, particularly for the analysis of the so-called alternative matrices (hair, nails, oral fluid, sweat). This procedure for the quantitative determination of targeted analytes has been reported since the early 1980s and today is the golden standard in analytical toxicology. However this technology has not found wide application the broad spectrum preliminarily screening of samples which is still mostly based on immunoassays. The aim of the present work was to test a recent instrumental approach based on UHPLC-Ion Trap-MS (Toxtyper®, Bruker Daltonics) intended to be used in routine contexts for the analysis of drug of abuse applied to hair toxicological analysis. The reported analytical method is based on a simple hair pre-treatment consisting of an overnight acid incubation in 0.1 mol/L HCl, followed by direct injection, after neutralization with equimolar amount of NaOH. The separation was then performed using a reverse phase column with a rapid gradient elution of 11 min (from 1% acetonitrile in 0.1% ammonium formate to 95% acetonitrile in 0.1% ammonium formate). Detection was by a fast ion trap analyzer (32,500 m/z sec-1) operating in the mass range 70-800 m/z. The chromatographic retention time and MS2/MS3 data were used for compound identification using a proprietary database which allowed to screen for up to 987 compounds. The tested analytical method showed limits of detection in the range between 0.01 and 0.09 ng/mg of hair matrix for a panel of 16 drugs of abuse (except for MDA, morphine, 6-MAM and norketamine, which showed limits of detection of 0.25, 0.15, 0.15 and 0.25 ng/mg, respectively). The method was validated according to international guidelines on a selected panel of drugs of abuse. The analytical performance of the instrument was assessed by analyzing 968 hair samples from forensic cases. A good concordance with a reference confirmatory method based on GC-MS was found in terms of classification of both negative and positive samples. Finally, the method was also successfully tested by analyzing 12 proficiency test samples containing not only common drugs of abuse but also new psychoactive substances, including fentanyls and cathinones.