Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Discordance Between Child-Pugh and National Cancer Institute Classifications for Hepatic Dysfunction: Implications on Dosing Recommendations for Oncology Compounds.
Elmeliegy, Mohamed; Yang, Derek Z; Salama, Engie; Parivar, Kourosh; Wang, Diane D.
Afiliación
  • Elmeliegy M; Global Product Development, Pfizer Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
  • Yang DZ; Global Product Development, Pfizer Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
  • Salama E; Skaggs School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Parivar K; Global Product Development, Pfizer Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
  • Wang DD; Skaggs School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 61(1): 105-115, 2021 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32691438
Guidance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency recommends using Child-Pugh classification for pharmacokinetic evaluation in noncancer subjects with hepatic impairment (HI). Therefore, dosing recommendations for oncology compounds for patients with HI are commonly based on Child-Pugh classification. In oncology clinical practice, National Cancer Institute classification (NCIc), is commonly used for evaluating hepatic function and dosing decisions for oncology patients. This work evaluated the discordance between the 2 systems and the impact on dosing recommendations. The classification system in HI studies was reviewed for FDA-approved oncology compounds. Discordance between Child-Pugh and NCIc was evaluated for sunitinib, dacomitinib, palbociclib, bosutinib, and axitinib. Pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses were conducted based on Child-Pugh classification and NCIc. Review of 117 approved oncology compounds showed prevalent use of Child-Pugh classification for dedicated HI studies in noncancer subjects. NCIc is commonly used in cancer patient studies. NCIc tended to classify subjects as less impaired versus Child-Pugh (64.9%, 73.7%, and 61.5% of subjects with mild, moderate, and severe HI, respectively, via Child-Pugh were classified as at least 1 category less impaired via NCIc). PK analyses by NCIc were consistent with Child-Pugh for sunitinib, dacomitinib, and palbociclib. For bosutinib, NCIc showed less impact of HI than Child-Pugh; an opposite trend was observed for axitinib. The impact of this considerable discordance between the 2 systems on dosing decisions bears consideration. When Child-Pugh is used for HI study enrollment, exploratory PK analyses based on NCIc should be conducted. Prescribers should attempt to use the same classification system in the product label for dosing decisions.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: National Cancer Institute (U.S.) / Hepatopatías / Pruebas de Función Hepática / Neoplasias / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Pharmacol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: National Cancer Institute (U.S.) / Hepatopatías / Pruebas de Función Hepática / Neoplasias / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Pharmacol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido