Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Activity of Cefiderocol Alone and in Combination with Levofloxacin, Minocycline, Polymyxin B, or Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole against Multidrug-Resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
Biagi, M; Vialichka, A; Jurkovic, M; Wu, T; Shajee, A; Lee, M; Patel, S; Mendes, R E; Wenzler, E.
Afiliación
  • Biagi M; College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Vialichka A; College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Jurkovic M; College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Wu T; College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Shajee A; College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Lee M; College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Patel S; College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Mendes RE; JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA.
  • Wenzler E; College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA wenzler@uic.edu.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32571820
The production of an L1 metallo-ß-lactamase and an L2 serine active-site ß-lactamase precludes the use of ß-lactams for the treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections. Preclinical data suggest that cefiderocol is the first approved ß-lactam with reliable activity against S. maltophilia, but data on strains resistant to current first-line agents are limited, and no studies have assessed cefiderocol-based combinations. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the in vitro activity of cefiderocol alone and in combination with levofloxacin, minocycline, polymyxin B, or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) against a collection of highly resistant clinical S. maltophilia isolates. For this purpose, the MICs of cefiderocol, ceftazidime, levofloxacin, minocycline, polymyxin B, and TMP-SMZ for 37 S. maltophilia isolates not susceptible to levofloxacin and/or TMP-SMZ were determined. Nine strains with various cefiderocol MICs were then tested in time-kill experiments with cefiderocol alone and in combination with comparators. The only agents for which susceptibility rates exceeded 40% were cefiderocol (100%) and minocycline (97.3%). Cefiderocol displayed the lowest MIC50 and MIC90 values (0.125 and 0.5 mg/liter, respectively). In time-kill experiments, synergy was observed when cefiderocol was combined with levofloxacin, minocycline, polymyxin B, or TMP-SMZ against 4/9 (44.4%), 6/9 (66.7%), 5/9 (55.5%), and 6/9 (66.7%) isolates, respectively. These data suggest that cefiderocol displays potent in vitro activity against S. maltophilia, including strains resistant to currently preferred agents. Future dynamic and in vivo studies of cefiderocol alone and in combination are warranted to further define cefiderocol's synergistic capabilities and its place in therapy for S. maltophilia infections.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas / Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas / Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos