Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of the Choosing Wisely Australia 5 Questions resource and a shared decision-making preparation video: protocol for an online experiment.
Muscat, Danielle Marie; Chang, Edward Hoi-Fan; Thompson, Rachel; Cvejic, Erin; Tracy, Marguerite; Zadro, Joshua; Smith, Jessica Kathleen; Lindner, Robyn; McCaffery, Kirsten.
Afiliación
  • Muscat DM; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia danielle.muscat@sydney.edu.au.
  • Chang EH; School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Thompson R; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Cvejic E; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Tracy M; School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Zadro J; Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Smith JK; School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Lindner R; NPS Medicinewise, Strawberry Hills, New South Wales, Australia.
  • McCaffery K; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
BMJ Open ; 9(11): e033126, 2019 11 14.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31727667
INTRODUCTION: Choosing Wisely, an international effort to reduce low value care worldwide, considers communication between clinicians and patients during routine clinical encounters a key mechanism for change. In Australia, Choosing Wisely has developed a 5 Questions resource to facilitate better conversations. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of the Choosing Wisely Australia 5 Questions resource and a video designed to prepare patients for question-asking and participation in shared decision-making on (a) self-efficacy to ask questions and participate in shared decision-making, (b) intention to participate in shared decision-making and (c) a range of secondary outcomes. The secondary aim of this study is to determine whether participants' health literacy modifies the effects of the interventions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will use 2×2×2 between-subjects factorial design (preparation video: yes, no × Choosing Wisely 5 Questions resource: yes, no × health literacy: adequate, inadequate). Participants will be recruited by an online market research company, presented with a hypothetical non-specific low back pain scenario, and randomised to study groups stratified by health literacy. Quantitative primary and secondary outcome data will be analysed as intention-to-treat using appropriate regression models (ie, linear regression for continuous outcomes, logistic regression for dichotomous categorical outcomes). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (protocol number: 2018/965). The results from this work will be disseminated through peer-reviewed international journals, conferences and updates with collaborating public health bodies. Resources developed for this study will be made available to patients and clinicians following trial completion. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This trial has been registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (trial number: 376477) and the stage is Pre-results.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Comunicación / Alfabetización en Salud / Toma de Decisiones Conjunta / Recursos en Salud Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Ethics / Patient_preference Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia Pais de publicación: Reino Unido
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Comunicación / Alfabetización en Salud / Toma de Decisiones Conjunta / Recursos en Salud Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Ethics / Patient_preference Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia Pais de publicación: Reino Unido