Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Fertility-sparing surgery for treatment of non-epithelial ovarian cancer: Oncological and reproductive outcomes in a prospective nationwide population-based cohort study.
Johansen, Gry; Dahm-Kähler, Pernilla; Staf, Christian; Flöter Rådestad, Angelique; Rodriguez-Wallberg, Kenny A.
Afiliación
  • Johansen G; Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecology and Reproduction, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Dahm-Kähler P; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Staf C; Regional Cancer Center Western Sweden, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Flöter Rådestad A; Department of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Rodriguez-Wallberg KA; Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Reproduction, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: kenny.rodriguez-wallberg@ki.se.
Gynecol Oncol ; 155(2): 287-293, 2019 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31493900
OBJECTIVE: To compare the oncologic outcome of women who underwent fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) vs. radical surgery (RS) for treatment of NEOC in a prospective, nationwide, population-based study and report on the reproductive outcomes in women after FSS. METHODS: Using the Swedish Quality Register for Gynecological Cancer, we identified all women ages 18-40 treated with either FSS or RS for stage I NEOC between 2008 and 2015. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. Data on use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments and obstetrical outcomes after FSS were extracted from the National Quality Register for Assisted Reproduction (Q-IVF) and the Swedish Medical Birth Register. RESULTS: During the study period, 73 women ages 18-40 received a stage I NEOC diagnosis. The majority, 78% (n = 57), underwent FSS. The 5-year OS rate, regardless of surgical approach, was 98%. There were no statistical differences between OS and PFS rates in women treated with FSS, compared to RS. Recurrences were more common after RS than FSS: 12.5% (2/16) vs. 3.5% (2/57), respectively. Following FSS, 11 women gave birth to 13 healthy children (all conceived naturally). Additionally, 12% of the women in the cohort developed infertility and received ART treatment (n = 7). CONCLUSION: FSS is not associated with worse oncologic outcomes than RS in young women with early stage NEOC. The prognosis was excellent in both groups, with an OS of 98%. Natural fertility was maintained in women treated with FSS, only 12% required ART treatment.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Ováricas / Preservación de la Fertilidad Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Gynecol Oncol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Ováricas / Preservación de la Fertilidad Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Gynecol Oncol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos