Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of the French and CARDS classifications for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: reliability and validity.
Kong, Chao; Sun, Xiangyao; Ding, Junzhe; Guo, Machao; Li, Xiangyu; Lu, Shibao.
Afiliación
  • Kong C; Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, China.
  • Sun X; Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, China.
  • Ding J; Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, China.
  • Guo M; Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, China.
  • Li X; Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, China.
  • Lu S; Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, China. spinelu@163.com.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 20(1): 382, 2019 Aug 20.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31429748
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the reliability and validity of the CARDS and French classification systems for lumbar DS. METHODS: Between May 2013 and December 2016, 158 consecutive patients diagnosed with single-level lumbar DS were included in this study, and all underwent lumbar fusion. All patients underwent long-cassette standing anterioposterior and lateral radiographs of the spine preoperatively and postoperatively. The images were graded according to the CARDS and French classification systems by two orthopedic spinal surgeons and two orthopedic spinal fellows, independently. Clinical outcome measures used were the visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey. Clinical data were collected before surgery and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 146 patients were finally included in this study and followed up for at least 1 year. When grading using the CARDS system, the κ values for inter- and intraobserver reliability were 0.837 and 0.869, respectively, representing perfect agreement. The interobserver κ value for the French classification was 0.693 and the intraobserver κ value was 0.743, both representing substantial agreement. CARDS Type D patients have higher preoperative back pain scores and better improvement after surgery compared with non-Type D patients. Mean back and leg pain was worse in French Type 5 patients, while the most significant improvement was also seen in Type 5 patients after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Both CARDS and French classification systems have acceptable reliability and validity. The CARDS system is easier to utilize and has better reliability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fusión Vertebral / Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad / Espondilolistesis / Dolor de la Región Lumbar / Dolor Musculoesquelético Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Asunto de la revista: FISIOLOGIA / ORTOPEDIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fusión Vertebral / Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad / Espondilolistesis / Dolor de la Región Lumbar / Dolor Musculoesquelético Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Asunto de la revista: FISIOLOGIA / ORTOPEDIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Reino Unido