Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Replanting of first-cycle oil palm results in a second wave of biodiversity loss.
Ashton-Butt, Adham; Willcock, Simon; Purnomo, Dedi; Aryawan, Anak A K; Wahyuningsih, Resti; Naim, Mohammad; Poppy, Guy M; Caliman, Jean-Pierre; Peh, Kelvin S-H; Snaddon, Jake L.
Afiliación
  • Ashton-Butt A; Department of Biological and Marine Sciences University of Hull Hull UK.
  • Willcock S; School of Biological Sciences University of Southampton Southampton UK.
  • Purnomo D; School of Biological Sciences University of Southampton Southampton UK.
  • Suhardi; School of Natural Sciences Bangor University Gwynedd UK.
  • Aryawan AAK; SMART Research Institute (SMARTRI) Riau Indonesia.
  • Wahyuningsih R; SMART Research Institute (SMARTRI) Riau Indonesia.
  • Naim M; SMART Research Institute (SMARTRI) Riau Indonesia.
  • Poppy GM; SMART Research Institute (SMARTRI) Riau Indonesia.
  • Caliman JP; SMART Research Institute (SMARTRI) Riau Indonesia.
  • Peh KS; School of Biological Sciences University of Southampton Southampton UK.
  • Snaddon JL; SMART Research Institute (SMARTRI) Riau Indonesia.
Ecol Evol ; 9(11): 6433-6443, 2019 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31236233
Conversion of forest to oil palm plantations results in a significant loss of biodiversity. Despite this, first-cycle oil palm plantations can sustain relatively high biodiversity compared to other crops. However, the long-term effects of oil palm agriculture on flora and fauna are unknown. Oil palm has a 25-year commercial lifespan before it must be replanted, due to reduced productivity and difficulty of harvesting. Loss of the complex vegetation structure of oil palm plantations during the replanting process will likely have impacts on the ecosystem at a local and landscape scale. However, the effect of replanting on biodiversity is poorly understood.Here, we investigate the effects of replanting oil palm on soil macrofauna communities. We assessed ordinal richness, abundance, and community composition of soil macrofauna in first- (25- to 27-year-old) and second-cycle oil palm (freshly cleared, 1-year-old, 3-year-old, and 7-year-old mature).Macrofauna abundance and richness drastically declined immediately after replanting. Macrofauna richness showed some recovery 7 years after replanting, but was still 19% lower than first-cycle oil palm. Macrofauna abundance recovered to similar levels to that of first-cycle oil palm plantations, 1 year after replanting. This was mainly due to high ant abundance, possibly due to the increased understory vegetation as herbicides are not used at this age. However, there were subsequent declines in macrofauna abundance 3 and 7 years after replanting, resulting in a 59% drop in macrofauna abundance compared to first-cycle levels. Furthermore, soil macrofauna community composition in all ages of second-cycle oil palm was different to first-cycle plantations, with decomposers suffering particular declines.After considerable biodiversity loss due to forest conversion for oil palm, belowground invertebrate communities suffer a second wave of biodiversity loss due to replanting. This is likely to have serious implications for soil invertebrate diversity and agricultural sustainability in oil palm landscapes, due to the vital ecosystem functions that soil macrofauna provide.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ecol Evol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ecol Evol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido