Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Comparative Evaluation of Five Obturation Techniques in the Management of Simulated Internal Resorptive Cavities: An Ex Vivo Study.
Elenjikal, Mathew J; Latheef, Abhilash A; Kader, Mohammed A M; Ganapathy, Sivadas; Mohamed, Ahmed B; Sainudeen, Shan S; Abdulla, Anshad M; Saquib, Shahabe S.
Afiliación
  • Elenjikal MJ; Elenjikal Dental Clinic, Cochin, Kerala, India.
  • Latheef AA; Department of Restorative Dental Science, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
  • Kader MAM; Department of Restorative Dental Science, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
  • Ganapathy S; Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Asian Institute of Medicine, Science and Technology, Kedah, Malaysia.
  • Mohamed AB; Department of Restorative Dental Science, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
  • Sainudeen SS; Department of Restorative Dental Science, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
  • Abdulla AM; Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontic Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
  • Saquib SS; Department of Preventive Dental Science, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci ; 11(Suppl 2): S450-S456, 2019 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31198386
BACKGROUND: Root resorption is the loss of dental hard tissues as a result of clastic activities. It might be broadly classified into external or internal resorption by the location of the resorption in relation to the root surface. the various techniques used these days for filling internal resorption include warm condensation, vertical condensation, core techniques, thermoplasticized gutta-percha, warm vertical compaction, and cold lateral condensation. OBJECTIVES: The aims and objectives of this study were to compare the quality of root fillings in artificially created internal resorption cavities filled with warm vertical compaction, lateral condensation, Obtura II along with System B, E and Q plus along with System B, and Thermafil, and to calculate the percentage of gutta-percha, sealer, and voids using an ImageJ software. RESULTS: Results between the warm vertical compaction (group I), lateral condensation (group II), Obtura II with System B (group III), E and Q plus with System B (group IV), and Thermafil (group V), group III showed the highest percentage of gutta-percha plus sealer and gutta-percha, and least number of voids, which was statistically significant (P < 0.000). CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that Obtura II along with System B was found to be the most suitable obturation technique for the management of teeth exhibiting internal resorption. Thermafil was found to give the poorest obturation quality when used to fill the teeth with internal resorption. Similarly, lateral condensation technique was observed to show maximum sealer and hence was not ideal for the management of internal resorptive cavities.
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Pharm Bioallied Sci Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India Pais de publicación: India
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Pharm Bioallied Sci Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India Pais de publicación: India