Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An in vitro evaluation of marginal fit zirconia crowns fabricated by a CAD-CAM dental laboratory and a milling center.
Meirowitz, Avi; Bitterman, Yoli; Levy, Sharon; Mijiritsky, Eitan; Dolev, Eran.
Afiliación
  • Meirowitz A; Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Bitterman Y; Department of Orthodontics, Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 69978, Tel - Aviv, Israel. Dr.bitterman@gmail.com.
  • Levy S; Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Mijiritsky E; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Dolev E; Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
BMC Oral Health ; 19(1): 103, 2019 06 13.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31196041
BACKGROUND: Marginal fit is critical for the success and longevity of a dental restoration. Zirconia crowns can be fabricated either chair-side, in a dental laboratory or in a milling center; each can give different marginal fits results. However, discussion of the marginal fit of zirconia crowns when different fabrication methods are compared is lacking in the literature. PURPOSE: To compare the marginal discrepancy (MD) and absolute marginal discrepancy (AMD) of computer-aided design, and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) used in a dental laboratory and a milling center for producing monolithic zirconia crowns. METHODS: The marginal fit of 30 zirconia crowns cemented to typodont teeth was evaluated by means of a sectioning technique. Fifteen crowns were fabricated with a CEREC inLAB MC X5 from IPS e.max ZirCAD blocks. Fifteen crowns were fabricated using a LAVA milling center from LAVA Plus Zirconia Blocks. The 30 crowns were sectioned with a precision saw, and MD and AMD were subsequently measured using a light microscope. Data were analyzed using the one-way ANOVA technique to investigate significant differences in the marginal fit between the two fabrication systems (α = .05). RESULTS: The AMD dimension of the CEREC inLAB system was significantly smaller (P < .05). Mean AMD values for zirconia crowns fabricated by the CEREC inLAB were 85 µm, and for the LAVA milling center 133 µm. There was no significant difference between the two systems regarding the MD dimensions. The MD values for zirconia crowns fabricated by the CEREC inLAB were 53 µm and for the LAVA milling center 61 µm. CONCLUSIONS: The CEREC inLAB system demonstrated significantly better marginal fit in relation to the AMD. However, no difference between the systems was found in the MD. Monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by the CAD-CAM CEREC inLAB system and the LAVA system milling center showed MD values of less than 120 µm, which is within the clinically acceptable range.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Circonio / Adaptación Marginal Dental / Coronas / Laboratorios Odontológicos Idioma: En Revista: BMC Oral Health Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Israel Pais de publicación: Reino Unido
Texto completo
Añadir a Mi BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar en Google

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Circonio / Adaptación Marginal Dental / Coronas / Laboratorios Odontológicos Idioma: En Revista: BMC Oral Health Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Israel Pais de publicación: Reino Unido