Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Five-year results of the complete versus culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention in multivessel disease using drug-eluting stents II (CORRECT II) study: a prospective, randomised controlled trial.
Fagel, N D; van Nooijen, F C; Maarse, M; Slagboom, T; Herrman, J P; van der Schaaf, R J; Amoroso, G; Patterson, M S; Laarman, G J; Suttorp, M J; Vink, M A.
Afiliación
  • Fagel ND; Department of Cardiology, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. n.d.fagel@olvg.nl.
  • van Nooijen FC; Department of Cardiology, Waterland Hospital, Purmerend, The Netherlands.
  • Maarse M; Department of Cardiology, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Slagboom T; Department of Cardiology, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Herrman JP; Department of Cardiology, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van der Schaaf RJ; Department of Cardiology, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Amoroso G; Department of Cardiology, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Patterson MS; Department of Cardiology, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Laarman GJ; Department of Cardiology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
  • Suttorp MJ; Department of Cardiology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
  • Vink MA; Department of Cardiology, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Neth Heart J ; 27(6): 310-320, 2019 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30868547
OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND: In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) the decision whether to treat a single culprit vessel or to perform multivessel revascularisation may be challenging. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MV-PCI) versus culprit vessel only (CV-PCI) in patients with stable coronary artery disease or non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. METHODS: In this dual-centre, prospective, randomised study a total 215 patients with MVD were randomly assigned to MV-PCI or CV-PCI. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including death, myocardial infarction (MI), and repeat revascularisation. Secondary endpoints were the combined endpoint of death or MI, the individual components of the primary endpoint, and the occurrence of stent thrombosis. Patients were followed up to 5 years after enrolment. RESULTS: The occurrence of the primary endpoint was similar at 28% versus 31% in the MV-PCI and CV-PCI group, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53-1.44, p = 0.59). The rate of repeat revascularisation was 15% versus 24% (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.11, p = 0.11), whereas definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred in 2% versus 0% (p = 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomised study comparing the strategies for MV-PCI and CV-PCI in patients with MVD, no difference was found in the occurrence of MACE after 5 years. We observed a numerically higher rate of death or MI and a lower rate of repeat revascularisation after MV-PCI, although these findings were not statistically significant.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Neth Heart J Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos Pais de publicación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Neth Heart J Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos Pais de publicación: Países Bajos