Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Neoadjuvant therapy versus upfront surgery for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer: A Markov decision analysis.
Bradley, Alison; Van Der Meer, Robert.
Afiliación
  • Bradley A; Department of Management Science, Strathclyde Business School, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
  • Van Der Meer R; West of Scotland Pancreatic Cancer Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
PLoS One ; 14(2): e0212805, 2019.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30817807
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant therapy has emerged as an alternative treatment strategy for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. In the absence of large randomized controlled trials offering a direct comparison, this study aims to use Markov decision analysis to compare efficacy of traditional surgery first (SF) and neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) pathways for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: An advanced Markov decision analysis model was constructed to compare SF and NAT pathways for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. Transition probabilities were calculated from randomized control and Phase II/III trials after comprehensive literature search. Utility outcomes were measured in overall and quality-adjusted life months (QALMs) on an intention-to-treat basis as the primary outcome. Markov cohort analysis of treatment received was the secondary outcome. Model uncertainties were tested with one and two-way deterministic and probabilistic Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: SF gave 23.72 months (18.51 QALMs) versus 20.22 months (16.26 QALMs). Markov Cohort Analysis showed that where all treatment modalities were received NAT gave 35.05 months (29.87 QALMs) versus 30.96 months (24.86QALMs) for R0 resection and 34.08 months (29.87 QALMs) versus 25.85 months (20.72 QALMs) for R1 resection. One-way deterministic sensitivity analysis showed that NAT was superior if the resection rate was greater than 51.04% or below 75.68% in SF pathway. Two-way sensitivity analysis showed that pathway superiority depended on obtaining multimodal treatment in either pathway. CONCLUSION: Whilst NAT is a viable alternative to traditional SF approach, superior pathway selection depends on the individual patient's likelihood of receiving multimodal treatment in either pathway.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pancreatectomía / Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión / Toma de Decisiones Clínicas Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pancreatectomía / Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión / Toma de Decisiones Clínicas Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos