Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Improving clinical judgment by simulation: a randomized trial and validation of the Lasater clinical judgment rubric in Chinese.
Yang, Fen; Wang, Yuncui; Yang, Chongming; Zhou, M Huifang; Shu, Jing; Fu, Bei; Hu, Hui.
Afiliación
  • Yang F; School of Nursing, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China.
  • Wang Y; School of Nursing, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China.
  • Yang C; Research Support Center, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.
  • Zhou MH; School of Nursing, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China.
  • Shu J; School of Nursing, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China.
  • Fu B; School of Nursing, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China.
  • Hu H; School of Nursing, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China. zhongyi90@163.com.
BMC Med Educ ; 19(1): 20, 2019 Jan 14.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30642320
BACKGROUND: The development and assessment of clinical judgment ability are essential in nursing education. The Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) was shown to be valid in evaluating nursing students' learning outcomes and skills in western cultures but has not been validated in mainland China. This study aimed to compare a simulation-teaching model with a traditional teaching method in enhancing the clinical judgment ability of nursing undergraduate students and to validate the Chinese version of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (C-LCJR). METHODS: Four classes of nursing students (n = 157) at Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, China, were randomly assigned to two control and two experimental classes. The experimental classes were taught using simulation teaching with standardized patients, while the control classes were taught using traditional teaching methods. At the end of the experiment, students in both kinds of classes evaluated their clinical judgment using the C-LCJR. Teachers also rated the students but without knowing who had received the simulation teaching. Confirmatory factor analysis and a Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes (MIMIC) model with Bayesian estimation was fit to the rating data to investigate measurement properties and experimental effects. RESULTS: Compared to the control classes, students in the experimental classes performed better in all subdomains of C-LCJR (noticing, interpreting, responding, and reflecting). The measurement properties of the C-LCJR were found to be satisfactory with high factor loadings and reliabilities and no bias from age, gender, and raters. CONCLUSIONS: The simulation teaching model is more effective than the traditional (non-simulation-based) teaching method in improving clinical judgment of Chinese nursing students. The C-LCJR is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring clinical judgment in nursing students in China.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estudiantes de Enfermería / Simulación de Paciente / Competencia Clínica / Bachillerato en Enfermería Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Educ Asunto de la revista: EDUCACAO Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estudiantes de Enfermería / Simulación de Paciente / Competencia Clínica / Bachillerato en Enfermería Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Educ Asunto de la revista: EDUCACAO Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Reino Unido