Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Systematic review of quality of life measures in patients with endometriosis.
Bourdel, Nicolas; Chauvet, Pauline; Billone, Valentina; Douridas, Giannis; Fauconnier, Arnaud; Gerbaud, Laurent; Canis, Michel.
Afiliación
  • Bourdel N; Department of Gynaecological Surgery, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
  • Chauvet P; Faculty of Medecine, ISIT-University of Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
  • Billone V; Department of Gynaecological Surgery, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
  • Douridas G; Faculty of Medecine, ISIT-University of Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
  • Fauconnier A; Department of Mother and Child, University Hospital P. Giaccone, Palermo, Italy.
  • Gerbaud L; Department of Gynaecological Surgery, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
  • Canis M; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy-Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Poissy, EA 7285 Research Unit 'Risk and Safety in Clinical Medicine for Women and Perinatal Health', Versailles-Saint-Quentin University (UVSQ), Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.
PLoS One ; 14(1): e0208464, 2019.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30629598
OBJECTIVES: Endometriosis and quality of life has been the subject of much research, however, there is little consensus on how best to evaluate quality of life in endometriosis, resulting in many and diverse scales being used. In our study, we aim to identify quality of life scales used in endometriosis, to review their strengths and weaknesses and to establish what would define an ideal scale in the evaluation of endometriosis-related quality of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was carried out for publications in English and French for the period from 1980 to February 2017, using the words 'endometriosis' and 'quality of life'. Publications were selected if they reported on quality of life in patients with endometriosis and specified use of a quality of life scale. A quantitative and a qualitative analysis of each scale was performed in order to establish the strengths and weaknesses for each scale (systematic registration number: PROSPERO 2014: CRD42014014210). RESULTS: A total of 1538 articles publications were initially identified. After exclusion of duplicates and application of inclusion criteria, 201 studies were selected for analysis. The SF-36, a generic HRQoL measure, was found to be the most frequently used scale, followed by the EHP-30, a measure specific to endometriosis. Both perform well, when compared with other scales, with scale weaknesses offset by strengths. EHP-5 and EQ-5D also showed to be of good quality. All four were the only scales to report on MCID studied in endometriosis patients. CONCLUSION: For clinical practice, routine evaluation of HRQOL in women with endometriosis is essential both for health-care providers and patients. Both SF-36 and EHP-30 perform better overall with regard to their strengths and weaknesses when compared to other scales.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Endometriosis Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Endometriosis Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos