Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Point-of-care ultrasound findings in unselected patients in an emergency department -results from a prospective observational trial.
Weile, Jesper; Laursen, Christian B; Frederiksen, Christian A; Graumann, Ole; Sloth, Erik; Kirkegaard, Hans.
Afiliación
  • Weile J; Emergency Department, Regional Hospital Herning, Herning, Denmark. jesper.weile@clin.au.dk.
  • Laursen CB; Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 161, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark. jesper.weile@clin.au.dk.
  • Frederiksen CA; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
  • Graumann O; Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
  • Sloth E; Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Kirkegaard H; Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
BMC Emerg Med ; 18(1): 60, 2018 12 27.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30587153
BACKGROUND: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) can improve patient management in the emergency department (ED). However, previous studies have focused only on selected groups of patients, such as trauma, shock, dyspnea, or critically ill patients, or patients with an already known diagnosis. Most patients seen in the ED do not match these criteria. We aim to present total prevalence of positive findings when basic POCUS is applied to the broad population of patients seen in an emergency department. METHODS: We conducted a single-center prospective explorative observational study of 405 unselected patients aged 18 years or over. A structured whole-body ultrasound examination was performed on all patients within 2 h of arrival to the ED. The ultrasound examination consisted of focused cardiac ultrasound, focused abdominal ultrasound, focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST), and focused lung ultrasound. RESULTS: We managed to perform 94.5% of all planned examinations. The study revealed positive findings in 39.3% of all included patients. This study presents the prevalence of positive findings among subgroups of patients. Divided among the categories of chief complaint, we found 62 positive examinations in 58 (14.3%; 95% CI, 10.9-17.7) unique patients with orthopedic complaints, 77 positive examinations among 59 (14.6%; 95% CI, 11.1-18.0) unique patients with medical complaints, and 55 positive examinations among 42 (10.4%; 95% CI, 7.4-13.3) unique patients with abdominal surgical complaints. CONCLUSION: POCUS revealed positive findings in more than one third of unselected patients in the emergency department. The study presents the findings and distribution among categories of chief complaints. Future investigations are necessary to elucidate the implication of the findings.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ultrasonografía / Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital / Pruebas en el Punto de Atención Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMC Emerg Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ultrasonografía / Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital / Pruebas en el Punto de Atención Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMC Emerg Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca Pais de publicación: Reino Unido