Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Scoping review of priority setting of research topics for musculoskeletal conditions.
Bourne, Allison M; Johnston, Renea V; Cyril, Sheila; Briggs, Andrew M; Clavisi, Ornella; Duque, Gustavo; Harris, Ian A; Hill, Catherine; Hiller, Claire; Kamper, Steven J; Latimer, Jane; Lawson, Andrew; Lin, Chung-Wei Christine; Maher, Christopher; Perriman, Diana; Richards, Bethan L; Smitham, Peter; Taylor, William John; Whittle, Sam; Buchbinder, Rachelle.
Afiliación
  • Bourne AM; Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Malvern, Victoria, Australia.
  • Johnston RV; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Cyril S; Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Malvern, Victoria, Australia.
  • Briggs AM; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Clavisi O; Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Malvern, Victoria, Australia.
  • Duque G; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Harris IA; School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Hill C; Musculoskeletal Australia, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Hiller C; Australian Institute for Musculoskeletal Science (AIMSS), The University of Melbourne and Western Health, St Albans, Victoria, Australia.
  • Kamper SJ; Department of Medicine-Western Health, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Latimer J; South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Lawson A; Division of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Lin CC; Department of Rheumatology Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, South Australia, Australia.
  • Maher C; Department of Rheumatology Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Perriman D; Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Richards BL; Centre for Pain, Health and Lifestyle, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Smitham P; Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Taylor WJ; Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Whittle S; University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Buchbinder R; Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
BMJ Open ; 8(12): e023962, 2018 12 16.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30559158
OBJECTIVE: Describe research methods used in priority-setting exercises for musculoskeletal conditions and synthesise the priorities identified. DESIGN: Scoping review. SETTING AND POPULATION: Studies that elicited the research priorities of patients/consumers, clinicians, researchers, policy-makers and/or funders for any musculoskeletal condition were included. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to November 2017 and the James Lind Alliance top 10 priorities, Cochrane Priority Setting Methods Group, and Cochrane Musculoskeletal and Back Groups review priority lists. The reported methods and research topics/questions identified were extracted, and a descriptive synthesis conducted. RESULTS: Forty-nine articles fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Methodologies and stakeholders varied widely (26 included a mix of clinicians, consumers and others, 16 included only clinicians, 6 included only consumers or patients and in 1 participants were unclear). Only two (4%) reported any explicit inclusion criteria for priorities. We identified 294 broad research priorities from 37 articles and 246 specific research questions from 17 articles, although only four (24%) of the latter listed questions in an actionable format. Research priorities for osteoarthritis were identified most often (n=7), followed by rheumatoid arthritis (n=4), osteoporosis (n=4) and back pain (n=4). Nearly half of both broad and specific research priorities were focused on treatment interventions (n=116 and 111, respectively), while few were economic (n=8, 2.7% broad and n=1, 0.4% specific), implementation (n=6, 2% broad and n=4, 1.6% specific) or health services and systems research (n=15, 5.1% broad and n=9, 3.7% specific) priorities. CONCLUSIONS: While many research priority-setting studies in the musculoskeletal field have been performed, methodological limitations and lack of actionable research questions limit their usefulness. Future studies should ensure they conform to good priority-setting practice to ensure that the generated priorities are of maximum value. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017059250.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Investigación / Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas / Investigación Biomédica Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Investigación / Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas / Investigación Biomédica Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia Pais de publicación: Reino Unido